Comparative Analysis of Quality of Raw Cut Steak in Different Parts

LUO Jieqiong; ZHANG Miao; JIA Hongfeng; BAI Ting; ZHANG Zhenyu

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070109

Issue 10

May. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING > 2023 > 44(10): 270-279.

LUO Jieqiong, ZHANG Miao, JIA Hongfeng, et al. Comparative Analysis of Quality of Raw Cut Steak in Different Parts[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(10): 270−279. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070109

Citation:

PDF( 813 KB)

Comparative Analysis of Quality of Raw Cut Steak in Different Parts

doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070109

1.
College of Food Science and Technology, Sichuan Tourism University, Chengdu 610100, China
2.
College of Sichuan Key Laboratory of Meat Processing, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China

Received Date: 13 Jul 2022
Issue Publish Date: 15 May 2023

Abstract

Abstract

With the four different parts (plate tendon, sirloin beef the naked eye, and beef fillet) of raw cut steak as the research object, this paper made a comparative analysis of its conventional nutrients, volatile flavor substances, amino acids, the color L^* value, a^* value, b^* value, water retention, etc, investigated the differences of the different parts of the raw cut steak in nutrition characteristics, edible quality, and processing suitability. According to the results, among the conventional nutrients, the protein content of plate tendon was the highest, the fat content of sirloin beef was the highest, but with the lowest water content, while the fat content of beef fillet was the lowest but with the highest water content. A total of 100 kinds of volatile flavor substances had been detected in the four parts, and 50, 56, 48 and 40 kinds of volatile substances were detected in plate tendon, sirloin, naked eye and beef fillet, respectively. Among them, there were 9 kinds of volatile flavor substances shared by 4 parts of steak. Nonanal content ranked top in 4 parts of steak, which was one of the main flavor substances of raw cut steak. In the color difference, there were significant differences in L^*, a^* and b^* between beef fillet and the other three parts (P<0.05), with the lowest brightness and lighter color. The cooking loss rate of the four parts was small, without significant difference (P>0.05). Plate Tendon was suitable for cryopreservation because of its lowest thawing loss rate. Among the texture indexes, the hardness and chewiness of plate tendon were the highest, whereas the hardness and chewiness of naked eye were the lowest (P>0.05). The ratios of essential amino acid/total amino acid (EAA/TAA) to total amino acid (EAA/TAA) in 4 different parts of raw steak were 39.80%, 39.10%, 38.90% and 39.50%, respectively, which were all around 40%. The contents of glutamic acid, histidine and other umami amino acids in 4 different parts of raw cut steak were higher. Thus, the raw cut steak of four different parts belonged to high-quality protein.
- different parts,
- raw cut steak,
- quality,
- comparison and analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(36)

References

[1]	穆静, 孙慧琳, 查恩辉. 不同储藏条件对牛肉品质的影响[J]. 保鲜与加工,2022,22(7):21−30. [MU J, SUN H J, CHA E H. Effects of different storage conditions on beef quality[J]. Preservation and Processing,2022,22(7):21−30.
[2]	朱青云, 谭亮, 赵静. 青海高原地区牦牛肉营养成分分析与品质评价[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2021,40(11):97−111. [ZHU Q Y, TAN L, ZHAO J. Analysis of nutritional compositions and quality evaluation of yak meat from Qinghai plateau regions[J]. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology,2021,40(11):97−111.
[3]	李慧, 连海飞, 王德宝. 不同部位西门塔尔牛肉理化品质分析及烤制加工适宜性的研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2021,42(3):97−101. [LI H, LIAN H F, WANG D B. Analysis of physical-chemical quality and suitability evaluation for roast processing of beef cuts from different parts of simmental cattle[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science,2021,42(3):97−101. doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2021.03.018
[4]	郎玉苗, 杨春柳, 孙宝忠. 安格斯×秦川育肥牛牛体不同部位肌肉肉质特性比较分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2019(3):52−57. [LANG Y M, YANG C L, SUN B Z. Meat quality characteristics of different muscles from fattened Angus×Qinchuan cattle[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine,2019(3):52−57. doi: 10.13881/j.cnki.hljxmsy.2018.07.0375
[5]	刘雪霏, 游佳伟, 程可欣. 不同部位牛肉烤制加工的适宜性[J]. 食品科学,2021,42(11):86−93. [LIU X F, YOU J W, CHENG K X. Roasting suitability of different beef from different cuts[J]. Food Science,2021,42(11):86−93.
[6]	GB 5009.3-2016, 食品安全国家标准食品中水分的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016. GB 5009.3-2016, National Food Safety Standard. Determination of moisture in foods[S]. BEIJING: Standards Press of China, 2016.
[7]	GB 5009.6-2016, 食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016. GB 5009.6-2016, National Food Safety Standard. Determination of fat in foods [S]. BEIJING: Standards Press of China, 2016.
[8]	GB 5009.5-2016, 食品安全国家标准食品中蛋白质的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016. GB 5009.5-2016, National Food Safety Standard. Determination of protein in foods [S]. BEIJING: Standards Press of China, 2016.
[9]	HUMADA MJ, SAÑUDO C, SERRANO E. Chemical composition, vitamin E content, lipid oxidation, colour and cooking losses in meat from Tudanca bulls finished on semi-extensive or intensive systems and slaughtered at 12 or 14 months[J]. Meat Science,2014,96(2):908−915. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.004
[10]	赵改名, 王可, 祝超智. 青海高原型牦牛不同部位肉的品质差异研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2020,41(13):60−65. [ZHAO G M, WANG K, ZHU C Z. Study on eat quality differences of different parts of qinghai high-prototype yak[J]. Food Research and Development,2020,41(13):60−65.
[11]	LI Chunbao, CHEN Yinji, XU Xinglian, et al. Effects of lowvoltage electrical stimulation and rapid chilling on meat quality characteristics of Chinese ellow crossbredbulls[J]. Meat Science,2010,72(1):9−17.
[12]	李莹, 张伟敏, 黄海珠. 三种猪肉质构特性比较研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2018,39(10):22−27. [LI Y, ZHANG W M, HUANG H Z. Comparative study on the texture characteristics of three kinds of pork[J]. Food Research and Development,2018,39(10):22−27.
[13]	KAZALA E C, LOZEMAN F J, MIR P S, et al. Relationship of fatty acid composition to intramuscular fat content in beef from crossbred Wagyu cattle[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1999,77(7):1717−1725. doi: 10.2527/1999.7771717x
[14]	张哲奇, 臧明伍, 张凯华, 等. 国内外肉品品质变化机制机理研究进展[J]. 肉类研究, 2017, 31(2): 57-63. ZHANG Z Q, ZANG M W, ZHANG K H, et al. State of the art in worldwide studies on mechanism of meat quality changes[J]. Meat Research, 2017, 31(2): 57-63.
[15]	李娜, 常紫阳, 余群力, 等. 新疆褐牛不同部位肉品质特性研究[J]. 现代农业科技,2019(5):217−219. [LI N, CHANG Z Y, YU Q L. Study on eat quality characteristics of different parts of xinjiang brown cattle[J]. Modern Agricultural Technology,2019(5):217−219.
[16]	王可. 不同部位青海高原型牦牛肉加工特性与加工适宜性研究[D].郑州: 河南农业大学, 2020. WANG K. Study on processing characteristics and suitability of Qinghai plateau yak meat from different parts [D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2020.
[17]	陈红霞. 伊拉兔生长过程中挥发性风味物质的变化及其定量研究[D]. 重庆, 西南大学, 2014. CHEN H X. Quantitative study on changes of volatile flavor compounds of Hyla rabbit during the growth[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2014.
[18]	赵万余, 李爱华. 宁夏滩羊不同部位肉中挥发性风味物质分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2012,40(5):2725−2727. [ZHAO W Y, LI A H. Volatile flavor composition in mutton of Ningxia Tan sheep[J]. Journal of Anhui Agriculture and Science,2012,40(5):2725−2727. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2012.05.236
[19]	侯莉, 赵健, 赵梦瑶,. 炖煮牛肉的风味物质分析[J]. 中国食品学报,2017,17(9):260−270. [HOU L, ZHAO J, ZHAO M Y. Analysis of the flavor compounds from stewed beef[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology,2017,17(9):260−270.
[20]	柯海瑞. 高温处理对牛肉脂肪及挥发性风味物质的影响研究[D]. 郑州: 河南科技大学, 2020. KE H R. Effect of high temperature treatment on beef fat and volatile flavors[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan University of Science and Technology, 2020.
[21]	王恒鹏, 吴鹏, 陈胜姝, 等. 排酸时间与熟制程度对牛肉挥发性风味物质的影响[J]. 食品与机械,2018,34(12):16−21. [WANG H P, WU P, CHEN S S, et al. Effects of aging time and cooking degree on volatile flavors of beef[J]. Food & Machinery,2018,34(12):16−21.
[22]	DEL, OLMO, ANA. Effect of high pressure processing and modified atmosphere packaging on the safety and quality of sliced ready-to-eat "lacon", a cured-cooked pork meat product[J]. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2014, 23(Null).
[23]	MANCINI A, SUMAN S P, KONDA M K R, et al. Effect of carbon monoxide packaging and lactate enhancement on the color stability of beef steaks stored at 1℃ for 9 days[J]. Meat Science,2009,81(1):71−76. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.06.021
[24]	SARR S M V, BERIAIN M J. Colour and texture characteristics in meat of male and female foals[J]. Meat Science,2006,74(4):738−745. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.005
[25]	明丹丹, 张一敏, 董鹏程, 等. 牛肉肉色的影响因素及其控制技术研究进展[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(1):284−291. [MING D D, ZHANG Y M, DONG P C, et al. Recent progress in studies of factors influencing beef color and technologies for controlling it[J]. Food Science,2020,41(1):284−291.
[26]	BARTOЙLUDĚK, BUREŠD, KOTRBA, R, et al. Comparison of meat quality between eland (Taurotragus oryx) and cattle (Bos taurus) raised under similar conditions[J]. Meat Science,2014,96(1):346−352. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.07.016
[27]	赵改名, 茹昂, 郝婉名. 不同母本西门塔尔杂交牛各部位肉品质与蛋白质功能特性的差异[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2021,47(7):78−85. [ZHAO G M, RU A, HAO W M. Comparation of meat quality and protein functional properties of different maternal Simmental hybrid cattle[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries,2021,47(7):78−85. doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.025392
[28]	LEE B, YOON S, CHOI Y M. Comparison of marbling fleck characteristics between beef marbling grades and its effect on sensory quality characteristics in high-marbled Hanwoo steer[J]. Meat Science,2019,152(Jun.):109−115.
[29]	敖冉, 赵雪聪, 王伟, 等. 驴肉在低温成熟过程中质构变化研究[J]. 食品工业,2016,37(7):126−128. [AO R, ZHAO X C, WANG W, et al. Research on the texture index of donkey meat during the postmortem aging at low temperature[J]. Food Industry,2016,37(7):126−128.
[30]	侯成立, 李欣, 王振宇. 不同部位牦牛肉氨基酸、脂肪酸含量分析与营养价值评价[J]. 肉类研究,2019,33(2):52−57. [HOU C L, LI X, WANG Z Y. Amino acid and fatty acid composition and nutritional value evaluation of different yak meat cuts[J]. Meat Research,2019,33(2):52−57. doi: 10.7506/rlyj1001-8123-20190121-016
[31]	NINA R, ANDREAS D, THOMAS H. Quantitative studies, taste reconstitution, and omission experiments on the key taste compounds in morel mushrooms (Morchella deliciosa Fr.)[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry,2006,54(7):2705−2711. doi: 10.1021/jf053131y
[32]	高媛, 黄彩霞, 冯岗. 风干牦牛肉氨基酸与脂肪酸组成分析评价[J]. 食品工业科技,2013,34(13):317−320. [GAO Y, HUANG C X, FENG G. Amino acid and fatty acid composition assay of airing yak meat[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2013,34(13):317−320. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.13.072
[33]	罗毅皓, 刘书杰. 青海大通牦牛肉氨基酸及风味分析[J]. 食品科技,2010,35(2):106−110,113. [LUO Y H, LIU S J. Study on the nutrient and flavor of Datong yak meat[J]. Food Science and Technology,2010,35(2):106−110,113. doi: 10.13684/j.cnki.spkj.2010.02.040
[34]	邱翔, 张磊, 文勇立, 等. 四川牦牛、黄牛主要品种肉的营养成分分析[J]. 食品科学,2010,31(15):112−116. [QIU X, ZHANG L, WEN Y L, et al. Nutritional composition analysis of meat from yak and yellow cattle in Sichuan[J]. Food Science,2010,31(15):112−116.
[35]	LI P, MAIK S, TRUSHENSKI J, et al. New develop-ments in fish amino acid nutrition: towards functional and environmentally oriented aquafeeds[J]. Amino Acids,2009,37(1):43−53. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0171-1
[36]	LARSSON T, KOPPANG E O, ESPE M, et al. Fillet quality and health of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fed a diet supplemented with glutamate[J]. Aqua-Culture,2014,426-427(1):288−295.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

Tables(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views(27) PDF downloads(0)

Comparative Analysis of Quality of Raw Cut Steak in Different Parts

doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070109

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Comparative Analysis of Quality of Raw Cut Steak in Different Parts

doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070109

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content