Issue 5
Jul 2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Khoong YM,Huang X,Meng XC,et al.Effects of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4-specific activator on human vascular endothelial cell functions and blood supply of rat perforator flap and its mechanism[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(5):434-446.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210419-00138.
Citation: Khoong YM,Huang X,Meng XC,et al.Effects of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4-specific activator on human vascular endothelial cell functions and blood supply of rat perforator flap and its mechanism[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(5):434-446.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210419-00138.

Effects of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4-specific activator on human vascular endothelial cell functions and blood supply of rat perforator flap and its mechanism

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210419-00138
Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772086, 82072177

"Outstanding Youth Medical Talents" of Shanghai "Rising Stars of Medical Talent" Youth Development Program 

Associate Professor Type A Category of Shanghai Jiao Tong University's "Chenxing" Youth Development Program 

"Two-hundred Talent" Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine 

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Zan Tao, Email: zantaodoctor@yahoo.com
  • Received Date: 19 Apr 2021
    Available Online: 20 Jul 2022
  • Issue Publish Date: 20 May 2022
  • Objective To analyze the effects of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4 (TRPV4) activation on the function and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), as well as to explore the effects of TRPV4 activation on blood perfusion and survival of rat perforator flap and the mechanism.
    Methods The experimental research methods were used. The 3rd to 6th passages of HUVECs were used for experiments and divided into 0.5 μmol/L 4α-phorbol 12, 13-didecanoate (4αPDD) group, 1.0 μmol/L 4αPDD group, 3.0 μmol/L 4αPDD group, 10.0 μmol/L 4αPDD group, and phosphate buffer solution (PBS) group, which were cultivated in corresponding final molarity of 4αPDD and PBS, respectively. The cell proliferation activity at 6 and 12 h of culture was detected using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8). Another batch of cells was acquired and divided into PBS group, 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group, and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group, which were treated similarly as described before and then detected for cell proliferation activity at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of culture. The residual scratch area of cells at post scratch hour (PSH) 12, 24, and 48 was detected by scratch test, and the percentage of the residual scratch area was calculated. The number of migrated cells at 24 and 48 h of culture was detected by Transwell experiment. The tube-formation assay was used to measure the number of tubular structures at 4 and 8 h of culture. The protein expressions of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Slug, and Snail at 24 h of culture were detected by Western blotting. All the sample numbers in each group at each time point in vitro experiments were 3. A total of 36 male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 8 to 10 weeks were divided into delayed flap group, 4αPDD group, and normal saline group according to the random number table, with 12 rats in each group, and iliolumbar artery perforator flap models on the back were constructed. The flap surgical delay procedure was only performed in the rats in delayed flap group one week before the flap transfer surgery. Neither rats in 4αPDD group nor normal saline group had flap surgical delay; instead, they were intraperitoneally injected with 4αPDD and an equivalent mass of normal saline, respectively, at 10 min before, 24 h after, and 48 h after the surgery. The general state of flap was observed on post surgery day (PSD) 0 (immediately), 1, 4, and 7. The flap survival rates were assessed on PSD 7. The flap blood perfusion was detected by laser speckle contrast imaging technique on PSD 1, 4, and 7. The microvascular density in the flap's choke vessel zone was detected by immunohistochemical staining. All the sample numbers in each group at each time point in vivo experiments were 12. Data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance for factorial design, analysis of variance for repeated measurement, one-way analysis of variance, least significant difference t test, and Bonferroni correction.
    Results At 6 and 12 h of culture, there were no statistically significant differences in cell proliferation activity in the overall comparison among PBS group, 0.5 μmol/L 4αPDD group, 1.0 μmol/L 4αPDD group, 3.0 μmol/L 4αPDD group, and 10.0 μmol/L 4αPDD group (P>0.05). At 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of culture, there were no statistically significant differences in cell proliferation activity in the overall comparison among PBS group, 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group, and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group (P>0.05). At PSH 12, the percentages of the residual scratch area of cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group were close to that in PBS group (P>0.05). At PSH 24 and 48, compared with those in PBS group, the percentages of the residual scratch area of cells in 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group were significantly decreased (with t values of 2.83 and 2.79, respectively, P<0.05), while the percentages of the residual scratch area of cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group showed no significant differences (P>0.05). At 24 h of culture, the number of migrated cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group were close to that in PBS group (P>0.05). At 48 h of culture, the number of migrated cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD groups were significantly greater than that in PBS group (with t values of 6.20 and 9.59, respectively, P<0.01). At 4 h of culture, the numbers of tubular structures of cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group were significantly greater than that in PBS group (with t values of 4.68 and 4.95, respectively, P<0.05 or <0.01). At 8 h of culture, the numbers of tubular structures of cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD groups were similar to that in PBS group (P>0.05). At 24 h of culture, compared with those in PBS group, the protein expression level of E-cadherin of cells in 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group was significantly decreased (t=5.13, P<0.01), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the protein expression level of E-cadherin of cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group (P>0.05); the protein expression level of N-cadherin of cells in 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group was significantly increased (t=4.93, P<0.01), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the protein expression level of N-cadherin of cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group (P>0.05); the protein expression levels of Slug of cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group were significantly increased (with t values of 3.85 and 6.52, respectively, P<0.05 or P<0.01); and the protein expression level of Snail of cells in 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group was significantly increased (t=4.08, P<0.05), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the protein expression level of Snail of cells in 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the protein expression levels of E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Slug, or Snail of cells between 1 μmol/L 4αPDD group and 3 μmol/L 4αPDD group (P>0.05). The general condition of flaps of rats in the three groups was good on PSD 0. On PSD 1, the flaps of rats in the three groups were basically similar, with bruising and swelling at the distal end. On PSD 4, the swelling of flaps of rats in the three groups subsided, and the distal end turned dark brown and necrosis occurred, with the area of necrosis in flaps of rats in normal saline group being larger than the areas in 4αPDD group and delayed flap group. On PSD 7, the necrotic areas of flaps of rats in the 3 groups were fairly stable, with the area of necrosis at the distal end of flap of rats in delayed flap group being the smallest. On PSD 7, the flap survival rates of rats in 4αPDD group ((80±13)%) and delayed flap group ((87±9)%) were similar (P>0.05), and both were significantly higher than (70±11)% in normal saline group (with t values of 2.24 and 3.65, respectively, P<0.05 or P<0.01). On PSD 1, the overall blood perfusion signals of rats in the 3 groups were basically the same, and the blood perfusion signals in the choke vessel zone were relatively strong, with a certain degree of underperfusion at the distal end. On PSD 4, the boundary between the surviving and necrotic areas of flaps of rats in the 3 groups became evident, and the blood perfusion signals in the choke vessel zone were improved, with the normal saline group's distal hypoperfused area of flap being larger than the areas in delayed flap group and 4αPDD group. On PSD 7, the blood perfusion signals of overall flap of rats had generally stabilized in the 3 groups, with the intensity of blood perfusion signal in the choke vessel zone and overall flap of rats in delayed flap group and 4αPDD group being significantly greater than that in normal saline group. On PSD 7, the microvascular density in the choke vessel zone of flap of rats in 4αPDD group and delayed flap group were similar (P>0.05), and both were significantly higher than that in normal saline group (with t values of 4.11 and 5.38, respectively, P<0.01).
    Conclusions After activation, TRPV4 may promote the migration and tubular formation of human vascular endothelial cells via the EndMT pathway, leading to the enhanced blood perfusion of perforator flap and microvascular density in the choke vessel zone, and therefore increase the flap survival rate.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    SmithRK,WykesJ,MartinDT,et al.Perforator variability in the anterolateral thigh free flap: a systematic review[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2017,39(7):779-789.DOI: 10.1007/s00276-016-1802-y.
    [2]
    LieKH,BarkerAS,AshtonMW.A classification system for partial and complete DIEP flap necrosis based on a review of 17,096 DIEP flaps in 693 articles including analysis of 152 total flap failures[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2013,132(6):1401-1408.DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000434402.06564.bd.
    [3]
    RiniIS,GunardiAJ,MarsaulinaRP,et al.A systematic review of the keystone design perforator island flap in the reconstruction of trunk defects[J].Arch Plast Surg,2020,47(6):535-541.DOI: 10.5999/aps.2020.00094.
    [4]
    JiangZM, LiXC, ChenM, et al. Effect of endogenous vascular endothelial growth factor on flap surgical delay in a rat flap model[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 143(1): 126-135. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005145.
    [5]
    TaylorGI, CorlettRJ, CaddyCM,et al. An anatomic review of the delay phenomenon: Ⅱ. Clinical applications [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1992, 89(3): 408-416;discussion 417-418.
    [6]
    MiyamotoS,MinabeT,HariiK.Effect of recipient arterial blood inflow on free flap survival area[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2008,121(2):505-513.DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000299185.32881.55.
    [7]
    TaylorGI,ChubbDP,AshtonMW.True and 'choke' anastomoses between perforator angiosomes: part Ⅰ. Anatomical location[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2013,132(6):1447-1456.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80638.
    [8]
    DharSC,TaylorGI.The delay phenomenon: the story unfolds[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,1999,104(7):2079-2091.DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199912000-00021.
    [9]
    GhaliS, ButlerPEM, TepperOM, et al. Vascular delay revisited[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2007, 119(6): 1735-1744. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000246384.14593.6e.
    [10]
    LuoZH,WuPF,QingLM,et al.The hemodynamic and molecular mechanism study on the choke vessels in the multi-territory perforator flap transforming into true anastomosis[J].Gene,2019,687:99-108.DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.019.
    [11]
    QingLM,LeiPF,TangJY,et al.Inflammatory response associated with choke vessel remodeling in the extended perforator flap model[J].Exp Ther Med,2017,13(5):2012-2018.DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4205.
    [12]
    GaliePA,NguyenDH,ChoiCK,et al.Fluid shear stress threshold regulates angiogenic sprouting[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2014,111(22):7968-7973.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310842111.
    [13]
    SeilerC,StollerM,PittB,et al.The human coronary collateral circulation: development and clinical importance[J].Eur Heart J,2013,34(34):2674-2682.DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht195.
    [14]
    HendrikseJ,HartkampMJ,HillenB,et al.Collateral ability of the circle of Willis in patients with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion: border zone infarcts and clinical symptoms[J].Stroke,2001,32(12):2768-2773.DOI: 10.1161/hs1201.099892.
    [15]
    HoeferIE, van RoyenN,BuschmannIR,et al.Time course of arteriogenesis following femoral artery occlusion in the rabbit[J].Cardiovasc Res,2001,49(3):609-617.DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6363(00)00243-1.
    [16]
    SchierlingW,TroidlK,ApfelbeckH,et al.Cerebral arteriogenesis is enhanced by pharmacological as well as fluid-shear-stress activation of the Trpv4 calcium channel[J].Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2011,41(5):589-596.DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.11.034.
    [17]
    TroidlC,TroidlK,SchierlingW,et al.Trpv4 induces collateral vessel growth during regeneration of the arterial circulation[J].J Cell Mol Med,2009,13(8B):2613-2621.DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00579.x.
    [18]
    BubolzAH,MendozaSA,ZhengXD,et al.Activation of endothelial TRPV4 channels mediates flow-induced dilation in human coronary arterioles: role of Ca2+ entry and mitochondrial ROS signaling[J].Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,2012,302(3):H634-642.DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00717.2011.
    [19]
    SonkusareSK,BonevAD,LedouxJ,et al.Elementary Ca2+ signals through endothelial TRPV4 channels regulate vascular function[J].Science,2012,336(6081):597-601.DOI: 10.1126/science.1216283.
    [20]
    DarbyWG,PotocnikS,RamachandranR,et al.Shear stress sensitizes TRPV4 in endothelium-dependent vasodilatation[J].Pharmacol Res,2018,133:152-159.DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.05.009.
    [21]
    BaeJH,WangZC,LiHZ,et al.Activation of TRPV4 increases neovascularization of rat prefabricated flaps[J].J Reconstr Microsurg,2018,34(1):35-40.DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607210.
    [22]
    Welch-ReardonKM,WuN,HughesCCW.A role for partial endothelial-mesenchymal transitions in angiogenesis?[J].Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2015,35(2):303-308.DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303220.
    [23]
    HultgrenNW,FangJS,ZieglerME,et al.Slug regulates the Dll4-Notch-VEGFR2 axis to control endothelial cell activation and angiogenesis[J].Nat Commun,2020,11(1):5400.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18633-z.
    [24]
    AzimiI,RobitailleM,ArmitageK,et al.Activation of the ion channel TRPV4 induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells[J].Int J Mol Sci,2020,21(24):9417.DOI: 10.3390/ijms21249417.
    [25]
    CappelliHC,KanugulaAK,AdapalaRK,et al.Mechanosensitive TRPV4 channels stabilize VE-cadherin junctions to regulate tumor vascular integrity and metastasis[J].Cancer Lett,2019,442:15-20.DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.07.042.
    [26]
    WangHF, ZhangBY, WangX, et al. TRPV4 overexpression promotes metastasis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer and correlates with poor prognosis[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2020, 13: 8383-8394. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S256918.
    [27]
    LeeWH,ChoongLY,JinTH,et al.TRPV4 plays a role in breast cancer cell migration via Ca2+-dependent activation of AKT and downregulation of E-cadherin cell cortex protein[J].Oncogenesis,2017,6(5):e338.DOI: 10.1038/oncsis.2017.39.
    [28]
    SharmaS,GoswamiR,RahamanSO.The TRPV4-TAZ mechanotransduction signaling axis in matrix stiffness- and TGFβ1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition[J].Cell Mol Bioeng,2019,12(2):139-152.DOI: 10.1007/s12195-018-00565-w.
    [29]
    SharmaS,GoswamiR,ZhangDX,et al.TRPV4 regulates matrix stiffness and TGFβ1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition[J].J Cell Mol Med,2019,23(2):761-774.DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13972.
    [30]
    ZanT,LiHZ,HuangX,et al.Augmentation of perforator flap blood supply with sole or combined vascular supercharge and flap prefabrication for difficult head and neck reconstruction[J].Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med,2020,22(6):441-448.DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0040.
    [31]
    LeseI,GrafDA,TsaiC,et al.Bioactive nanoparticle-based formulations increase survival area of perforator flaps in a rat model[J].PLoS One,2018,13(11):e0207802.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207802.
    [32]
    ChenM,LiXC,JiangZM,et al.Visualizing the pharmacologic preconditioning effect of botulinum toxin type a by infrared thermography in a rat pedicled perforator island flap model[J].Plast Reconstr Surg,2019,144(6):1016e-1024e.DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006251.
    [33]
    SilvestreJS,SmadjaDM,LévyBI.Postischemic revascularization: from cellular and molecular mechanisms to clinical applications[J].Physiol Rev,2013,93(4):1743-1802.DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2013.
    [34]
    OlejarzW,Kubiak-TomaszewskaG,ChrzanowskaA,et al.Exosomes in angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic therapy in cancers[J].Int J Mol Sci,2020,21(16):5840.DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165840.
    [35]
    CarmelietP.Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis[J].Nat Med,2000,6(4):389-395.DOI: 10.1038/74651.
    [36]
    AdapalaRK,ThoppilRJ,GhoshK,et al.Activation of mechanosensitive ion channel TRPV4 normalizes tumor vasculature and improves cancer therapy[J].Oncogene,2016,35(3):314-322.DOI: 10.1038/onc.2015.83.
    [37]
    ThoppilRJ,CappelliHC,AdapalaRK,et al.TRPV4 channels regulate tumor angiogenesis via modulation of Rho/Rho kinase pathway[J].Oncotarget,2016,7(18):25849-25861.DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8405.
    [38]
    WenL,WenYC,KeGJ,et al.TRPV4 regulates migration and tube formation of human retinal capillary endothelial cells[J].BMC Ophthalmol,2018,18(1):38.DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-0697-2.
    [39]
    TilletE,VittetD,FéraudO,et al.N-cadherin deficiency impairs pericyte recruitment, and not endothelial differentiation or sprouting, in embryonic stem cell-derived angiogenesis[J].Exp Cell Res,2005,310(2):392-400.DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.08.021.
    [40]
    Welch-ReardonKM,EhsanSM,WangK,et al.Angiogenic sprouting is regulated by endothelial cell expression of Slug[J].J Cell Sci,2014,127(Pt 9):2017-2028.DOI: 10.1242/jcs.143420.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(9)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(85) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return