Volume 38 Issue 9
Sep 2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yang Y,Li L,Yang ZJ,et al.Effects of low-dose photodynamic therapy on the function of human adipose mesenchymal stem cells and its mechanism[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(9):830-838.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220325-00092.
Citation: Yang Y,Li L,Yang ZJ,et al.Effects of low-dose photodynamic therapy on the function of human adipose mesenchymal stem cells and its mechanism[J].Chin J Burns Wounds,2022,38(9):830-838.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220325-00092.

Effects of low-dose photodynamic therapy on the function of human adipose mesenchymal stem cells and its mechanism

doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220325-00092
Funds:

General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82172203

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Yin Rui, Email: swyinrui@163.com
  • Received Date: 25 Mar 2022
    Available Online: 27 Sep 2022
  • Issue Publish Date: 20 Sep 2022
  • Objective To investigate the effects of low-dose photodynamic therapy on the proliferation, regulation, and secretion functions of human adipose mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) and the related mechanism, so as to explore a new method for the repair of chronic wounds.
    Methods The experimental research methods were adopted. From February to April 2021, 10 patients (5 males and 5 females, aged 23 to 47 years) who underwent cutaneous surgery in the Department of Dermatology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University) donated postoperative waste adipose tissue. The cells were extracted from the adipose tissue and the phenotype was identified. Three batches of ADSCs were taken, with each batch of cells being divided into normal control group with conventional culture only, photosensitizer alone group with conventional culture after being treated with Hemoporfin, irradiation alone group with conventional culture after being treated with red light irradiation, and photosensitizer+irradiation group with conventional culture after being treated with Hemoporfin and red light irradiation, with sample number of 3 in each group. At culture hour of 24 after the treatment of the first and second batches of cells, the ADSC proliferation level was evaluated by 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine staining method and the migration percentage of HaCaT cells cocultured with ADSCs was detected by Transwell experiment, respectively. On culture day of 7 after the treatment of the third batch of cells, the extracellular matrix protein expression of ADSCs was detected by immunofluorescence method. The ADSCs were divided into 0 min post-photodynamic therapy group, 15 min post-photodynamic therapy group, 30 min post-photodynamic therapy group, and 60 min post-photodynamic therapy group, with 3 wells in each group. Western blotting was used to detect the protein expressions and calculate the phosphorylated mammalian target of rapamycin complex (p-mTOR)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), phosphorylated p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p-p70 S6K)/p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70 S6K) ratio at the corresponding time points after photodynamic therapy. Two batches of ADSCs were taken, and each batch was divided into normal control group, photodynamic therapy alone group, and photodynamic therapy+rapamycin group, with 3 wells in each group. At culture minute of 15 after the treatment, p-mTOR/mTOR and p-p70 S6K/p70 S6K ratios of cells from the first batch were calculated and detected as before. On culture day of 7 after the treatment, extracellular matrix protein expression of cells from the second batch was detected as before. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and least significant difference test.
    Results After 12 d of culture, the cells were verified as ADSCs. At culture hour of 24 after the treatment, the ADSC proliferation level ((4.0±1.0)% and (4.1±0.4)%, respectively) and HaCaT cell migration percentages (1.17±0.14 and 1.13±0.12, respectively) in photosensitizer alone group and irradiation alone group were similar to those of normal control group ((3.7±0.6)% and 1.00±0.16, respectively, P>0.05), and were significantly lower than those of photosensitizer+irradiation group ((34.2±7.0)% and 2.55±0.13, respectively, P<0.01). On culture day of 7 after the treatment, compared with those in normal control group, the expression of collagen Ⅲ in ADSCs of photosensitizer alone group was significantly increased (P<0.05), and the expressions of collagen Ⅰ and collagen Ⅲ in ADSCs of irradiation alone group were significantly increased (P<0.01). Compared with those in photosensitizer alone group and irradiation alone group, the expressions of collagen Ⅰ, collagen Ⅲ, and fibronectin of ADSCs in photosensitizer+irradiation group were significantly increased (P<0.01). Compared with those in 0 min post-photodynamic therapy group, the ratios of p-mTOR/mTOR and p-p70 S6K/p70 S6K of ADSCs in 15 min post-photodynamic therapy group were significantly increased (P<0.01), the ratios of p-p70 S6K/p70 S6K of ADSCs in 30 min post-photodynamic therapy group and 60 min post-photodynamic therapy group were both significantly increased (P<0.01). At culture minute of 15 after the treatment, compared with those in normal control group, the ratios of p-mTOR/mTOR and p-p70 S6K/p70 S6K of ADSCs in photodynamic therapy alone group were significantly increased (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Compared with those in photodynamic therapy alone group, the ratios of p-mTOR/mTOR and p-p70 S6K/p70 S6K of ADSCs in photodynamic therapy+rapamycin group were significantly decreased (P<0.05). On culture day of 7 after the treatment, compared with those in normal control group, the expressions of collagen Ⅰ, collagen Ⅲ, and fibronectin of ADSCs in photodynamic therapy alone group were significantly increased (P<0.01). Compared with those in photodynamic therapy alone group, the expressions of collagen Ⅰ, collagen Ⅲ, and fibronectin of ADSCs in photodynamic therapy+rapamycin group were significantly decreased (P<0.01).
    Conclusions Low-dose photodynamic therapy can promote the proliferation of ADSCs, improve the ability of ADSCs to regulate the migration of HaCaT cells, and enhance the secretion of extracellular matrix protein by rapidly activating mTOR signaling pathway.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    CastanoAP, DemidovaTN, HamblinMR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one-photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization[J]. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther,2004,1(4):279-293.DOI: 10.1016/S1572-1000(05)00007-4.
    [2]
    GunaydinG, GedikME, AyanS. Photodynamic therapy for the treatment and diagnosis of cancer-a review of the current clinical status[J]. Front Chem,2021,9:686303.DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.686303.
    [3]
    KimM, JungHY, ParkHJ. Topical PDT in the treatment of benign skin diseases: principles and new applications[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2015,16(10):23259-23278.DOI: 10.3390/ijms161023259.
    [4]
    PlaetzerK, KrammerB, BerlandaJ, et al. Photophysics and photochemistry of photodynamic therapy: fundamental aspects[J]. Lasers Med Sci,2009,24(2):259-268.DOI: 10.1007/s10103-008-0539-1.
    [5]
    HuCX, ZhaoLF, PengCG, et al. Regulation of the mitochondrial reactive oxygen species: strategies to control mesenchymal stem cell fates ex vivo and in vivo[J]. J Cell Mol Med,2018,22(11):5196-5207.DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13835.
    [6]
    YangZJ, HuXH, ZhouLN, et al. Photodynamic therapy accelerates skin wound healing through promoting re-epithelialization[J/OL]. Burns Trauma,2021,9:tkab008[2022-03-25]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34514005/.DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab008.
    [7]
    KaushikK, DasA. Endothelial progenitor cell therapy for chronic wound tissue regeneration[J]. Cytotherapy,2019,21(11):1137-1150.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.09.002.
    [8]
    De LucaM, AiutiA, CossuG, et al. Advances in stem cell research and therapeutic development[J]. Nat Cell Biol,2019,21(7):801-811.DOI: 10.1038/s41556-019-0344-z.
    [9]
    JoH, BritoS, KwakBM, et al. Applications of mesenchymal stem cells in skin regeneration and rejuvenation[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2021,22(5):2410.DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052410.
    [10]
    DasM, MayilsamyK, MohapatraSS, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: progress and prospects[J]. Rev Neurosci,2019,30(8):839-855.DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2019-0002.
    [11]
    DolatiS, YousefiM, MahdipourM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell and bone marrow mononuclear cell therapy for cardiomyopathy: from bench to bedside[J]. J Cell Biochem,2019,120(1):45-55.DOI: 10.1002/jcb.27531.
    [12]
    HaDH, KimHK, LeeJ, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived exosomes for immunomodulatory therapeutics and skin regeneration[J]. Cells,2020,9(5):1157.DOI: 10.3390/cells9051157.
    [13]
    ShuklaL, YuanYN, ShayanR, et al. Fat therapeutics: the clinical capacity of adipose-derived stem cells and exosomes for human disease and tissue regeneration[J]. Front Pharmacol,2020,11:158.DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00158.
    [14]
    NaderiN, CombellackEJ, GriffinM, et al. The regenerative role of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) in plastic and reconstructive surgery[J]. Int Wound J,2017,14(1):112-124.DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12569.
    [15]
    WernerS, GroseR. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines[J]. Physiol Rev,2003,83(3):835-870.DOI: 10.1152/physrev.2003.83.3.835.
    [16]
    FalangaV. Growth factors and chronic wounds: the need to understand the microenvironment[J]. J Dermatol,1992,19(11):667-672.DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1992.tb03756.x.
    [17]
    ShuFT, GaoHJ, WuWF, et al. Amniotic epithelial cells accelerate diabetic wound healing by protecting keratinocytes and fibroblasts from high-glucose-induced senescence[J]. Cell Biol Int,2022,46(5):755-770.DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11771.
    [18]
    BerberichB, ThrieneK, GretzmeierC, et al. Proteomic profiling of fibroblasts isolated from chronic wounds identifies disease-relevant signaling pathways[J]. J Invest Dermatol,2020,140(11):2280-2290.e4.DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.040.
    [19]
    HardingKG, MooreK, PhillipsTJ. Wound chronicity and fibroblast senescence--implications for treatment[J]. Int Wound J,2005,2(4):364-368.DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00149.x.
    [20]
    DongWP, SongZC, LiuSH, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells based on electrospun biomimetic scaffold mediated endothelial differentiation facilitating regeneration and repair of abdominal wall defects via HIF-1α/VEGF pathway[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol,2021,9:676409.DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.676409.
    [21]
    LeeCH, ShahB, MoioliEK, et al. CTGF directs fibroblast differentiation from human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and defines connective tissue healing in a rodent injury model[J]. J Clin Invest,2010,120(9):3340-3349.DOI: 10.1172/JCI43230.
    [22]
    Chavez-MunozC, NguyenKT, XuW, et al. Transdifferentiation of adipose-derived stem cells into keratinocyte-like cells: engineering a stratified epidermis[J]. PLoS One,2013,8(12):e80587.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080587.
    [23]
    JiangDS, Scharffetter-KochanekK. Mesenchymal stem cells adaptively respond to environmental cues thereby improving granulation tissue formation and wound healing[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol,2020,8:697.DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00697.
    [24]
    HuangYZ, GouM, DaLC, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for chronic wound healing: current status of preclinical and clinical studies[J]. Tissue Eng Part B Rev,2020,26(6):555-570.DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2019.0351.
    [25]
    MaxsonS, LopezEA, YooD, et al. Concise review: role of mesenchymal stem cells in wound repair[J]. Stem Cells Transl Med,2012,1(2):142-149.DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2011-0018.
    [26]
    FuXR, LiuG, HalimA, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell migration and tissue repair[J]. Cells,2019,8(8):784.DOI: 10.3390/cells8080784.
    [27]
    RaposioE, BertozziN. Isolation of ready-to-use adipose-derived stem cell (ASC) pellet for clinical applications and a comparative overview of alternate methods for ASC isolation[J]. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol,2017,41:1F.17.1-1F.17.12.DOI: 10.1002/cpsc.29.
    [28]
    BacakovaL, ZarubovaJ, TravnickovaM, et al. Stem cells: their source, potency and use in regenerative therapies with focus on adipose-derived stem cells - a review[J]. Biotechnol Adv,2018,36(4):1111-1126.DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.011.
    [29]
    SiZZ, WangX, SunCH, et al. Adipose-derived stem cells: sources, potency, and implications for regenerative therapies[J]. Biomed Pharmacother,2019,114:108765.DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108765.
    [30]
    Díaz-GarcíaD, FilipováA, Garza-VelozI, et al. A beginner's introduction to skin stem cells and wound healing[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2021,22(20):11030.DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011030.
    [31]
    RodriguesM, KosaricN, BonhamCA, et al. Wound healing: a cellular perspective[J]. Physiol Rev,2019,99(1):665-706.DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00067.2017.
    [32]
    MoritaM, GravelSP, HuleaL, et al. mTOR coordinates protein synthesis, mitochondrial activity and proliferation[J]. Cell Cycle,2015,14(4):473-480.DOI: 10.4161/15384101.2014.991572.
    [33]
    CarrascoE, CalvoMI, Bl􀅡zquez-CastroA, et al. Photoactivation of ROS production in situ transiently activates cell proliferation in mouse skin and in the hair follicle stem cell niche promoting hair growth and wound healing[J]. J Invest Dermatol,2015,135(11):2611-2622.DOI: 10.1038/jid.2015.248.
    [34]
    Al-AzabM, WangB, ElkhiderA, et al. Indian hedgehog regulates senescence in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell through modulation of ROS/mTOR/4EBP1, p70S6K1/2 pathway[J]. Aging (Albany NY),2020,12(7):5693-5715.DOI: 10.18632/aging.102958.
    [35]
    GuoW, QiuW, AoX, et al. Low-concentration DMSO accelerates skin wound healing by Akt/mTOR-mediated cell proliferation and migration in diabetic mice[J]. Br J Pharmacol,2020,177(14):3327-3341.DOI: 10.1111/bph.15052.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(8)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(38) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return