Volume 70 Issue 10
May. 2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Song Yue, Li Jun-Qi, Liang Jiu-Qing. Dynamics of quantum correlation for three qubits in hierarchical environment[J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 70(10): 100301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202133
Citation: Song Yue, Li Jun-Qi, Liang Jiu-Qing. Dynamics of quantum correlation for three qubits in hierarchical environment[J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 70(10): 100301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202133

Dynamics of quantum correlation for three qubits in hierarchical environment

doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202133
More Information
  • Corresponding author: Li Jun-Qi, E-mail: ljqsxu@163.com
  • Received Date: 15 Dec 2020
  • Rev Recd Date: 09 Jan 2021
  • Available Online: 27 May 2021
  • Publish Date: 27 May 2021
  • Much attention has been paid to the dynamics of quantum correlation in an open quantum system coupled to a single-layered environment for a long time. However, the system can be influenced by the multilayer environment or hierarchical environment in realistic scenarios, which is attracting increasing interest at present. In this context, we explore in this paper the dynamics of quantum correlation for a quantum system consisting of three independent qubits, each being immersed in a single mode lossy cavity which is further connected to another cavity. The influences of cavity-cavity coupling strength Ω and the decay rate of cavity Γ1 on the measures of quantum correlation, including negativity, Bell non-locality as well as entanglement witness, are investigated in detail in a strong coupling regime and a weak coupling regime. It is shown that the phenomena of sudden death and sudden birth can happen to both Bell non-locality and entanglement witness. When the decay rate Γ1 = 0 is given, with the increase of Ω these measures eventually reach their stationary values over time after a short period of damping oscillations, in which these stationary values will become larger for the larger Ω. At the same time, the values or the survival times of quantum correlation considered by us in the weak coupling regime are better than in the strong coupling case. In addition, the non-zero Γ1 has a great negative effect on quantum correlation. Hence, in order to suppress the loss of quantum correlation better, the effective manipulation of quantum weak measurement and measurement reversal operator is considered further. Some interesting results are obtained.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Paneru D, Cohen E, Fickler R, Boyd R W, Karimi E 2020 Rep. Prog. Phys. 83 064001 doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/ab85b9
    [2]
    Su Z F, Tan H S, Li X Y 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 042112 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.042112
    [3]
    Bennett C H, Brassard G, Crépeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A, Wootters W K 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1895 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895
    [4]
    Kura N, Ueda M 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 010507 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.010507
    [5]
    Hu X M, Xing W B, Liu B H, Huang Y F, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 090503 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.090503
    [6]
    Sabín C, García-Alcaine G 2007 Eur. Phys. J. D 48 435 doi: 10.1140%2Fepjd%2Fe2008-00112-5
    [7]
    Maity A G, Das D, Ghosal A, Roy A, Majumdar A S 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 042340 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.042340
    [8]
    Rosset D, Branciard C, Barnea T J, Pütz G, Brunner N, Gisin N 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 010403 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.010403
    [9]
    Altintas F, Eryigit R 2010 Phys. Lett. A 374 4283 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2010.08.060
    [10]
    Anwer H, Nawareg M, Cabello A, Bourennane M 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 022104 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.022104
    [11]
    Shin D K, Henson B M, Hodgman S S, Wasak T, Chwedeńczuk J, Truscott A G 2019 Nature 10 4447
    [12]
    Kuo W T, Akhtar A A, Arovas D P, You Y Z 2020 Phys. Rev. B 101 224202 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.224202
    [13]
    刑贵超, 夏云杰 2018 物理学报 67 070301 doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172546

    Xing G C, Xia Y J 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 070301 doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172546
    [14]
    Yu T, Eberly J H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 140404 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.140404
    [15]
    López C E, Romero G, Lastra F, Solano E, Retamal J C 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 080503 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.080503
    [16]
    Aguilar G H, Valdés-Hernández A, Davidovich L, Walborn S P, Souto Ribeiro P H 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 240501 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.240501
    [17]
    Antonelli C, Shtaif M, Brodsky M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 080404 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.080404
    [18]
    Bellomo B, Lo Franco R, Compagno G 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 160502 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.160502
    [19]
    Mohamed A B A, Eleuch H, Raymond Ooi C H 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 19632 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55548-2
    [20]
    Deordi G L, Vidiella-Barranco A 2020 Opt. Commun. 475 126233 doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126233
    [21]
    Pramanik T, Cho Y W, Han S W, Lee S Y, Moon S, Kim Y S 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 042311 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.042311
    [22]
    Hu M L 2012 Ann. Phys. 327 2332 doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2012.05.007
    [23]
    Weilenmann M, Dive B, Trillo D, Aguilar E A, Navascués M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 200502
    [24]
    Zhou Y 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 012301 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.012301
    [25]
    Hanson R, Dobrovitski V V, Feiguin A E, Gywat O, Awschalom D D 2008 Science 320 352 doi: 10.1126/science.1155400
    [26]
    Man Z X, Xia Y J, Rosario L F 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 012315 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.012315
    [27]
    Basit A, Ali H, Badshah F, Zhang H Y, Ge G Q 2017 Laser Phys. Lett. 14 125202 doi: 10.1088/1612-202X/aa8bc8
    [28]
    Bai X M, Xue N T, Liu N, Li J Q, Liang J Q 2019 Ann. Phys. 531 1900098 doi: 10.1002/andp.201900098
    [29]
    Xu K, Zhang G F, Zhou Y, Liu W M 2020 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37 933 doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.383699
    [30]
    Kim Y S, Lee J C, Kwon O, Kim Y H 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 117 doi: 10.1038/nphys2178
    [31]
    Korotkov A N, Keane K 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 040103(R doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.040103
    [32]
    He Z, Zeng H S 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 299 doi: 10.1007/s11128-020-02791-6
    [33]
    Qiu L, Tang G, Yang X Q, Wang A 2014 Ann. Phys. 350 137 doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2014.07.012
    [34]
    Groen J P, Ristè D, Tornberg L, Cramer J, Degroot P C, Picot T, Johansson G, Dicarlo L 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 090506 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.090506
    [35]
    Man Z X, Xia Y J, Rosario L F 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 13843 doi: 10.1038/srep13843
    [36]
    Gühne O, Tóth G 2009 Phys. Rep. 474 1 doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004
    [37]
    Xiao X, Yao Y, Zhong W J, Li Y L, Xie Y M 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 012307 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012307
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(129) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return