Jet-A表征燃料/乙醇掺混燃料层流燃烧特性研究

何旭; 江正晖; 桑正; 刘泽昌; 冯光远; 杨青; 蒋厚实

doi:10.123456/j.rhnk.0000-00

Jet-A表征燃料/乙醇掺混燃料层流燃烧特性研究

doi: 10.123456/j.rhnk.0000-00

何旭^{1, 2,},
江正晖¹,
桑正¹,
刘泽昌¹,
冯光远¹,
杨青^{1, 2},
蒋厚实^1,*, ,

1.
北京理工大学机械与车辆学院, 北京 100081
2.
北京电动车辆协同创新中心, 北京 100081

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金面上项目 (No:21961122007)

详细信息

作者简介:
何旭（1976—），男，博士，副教授， E-mail: 11111111@bit.edu.cn

通讯作者:
蒋厚实（1990-），男，博士，助理研究员， E-mail:12345678@hotmail.com

中图分类号: TK421.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 104
- HTML全文浏览量: 165
- PDF下载量: 1
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-10-24
- 网络出版日期: 2023-07-10

Laminar Combustion Characteristics of Jet-A surrogate Fuel /Ethanol

HE Xu^{1, 2
,},
JIANG Zhenghui¹,
SANG Zheng¹,
LIU Zechang¹,
FENG Guangyuan¹,
YANG Qin^{1, 2},
JIANG Houshi^{1,*
, ,}

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in Beijing , Beijing 100081, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究初始温度470K、初始压力0.1MPa下乙醇掺混对航空煤油层流火焰燃烧特性的影响，文中利用定容燃烧弹设备结合仿真进行对比分析。结果表明，乙醇的加入显著提升了航空煤油的层流火焰燃烧速度，但仿真结果与试验数据之间存在较大的偏差，在低当量比时尤为严重，需进一步优化机理。在此基础上通过敏感性分析，发现对层流火焰燃烧速度影响较大的4个基元反应，通过对4个基元反应的参数进行调整，修改得到新模型，该模型与试验值存在较好的吻合度。
- 航空煤油 /
- 乙醇 /
- 层流火焰燃烧速度 /
- 敏感性分析
Abstract: To study the effect of ethanol blending on the combustion characteristics of aviation kerosene laminar flame at an initial temperature of 470K and an initial pressure of 0.1MPa, a constant volume incendiary bomb was used in this paper to conduct a comparative analysis combined with simulation. The results show that the addition of ethanol significantly improves the laminar burning velocity of aviation kerosene, but there is a large deviation between the simulation results and the experimental data, especially at low equivalence ratios, and the mechanism needs to be further optimized. On this basis, a sensitivity analysis was carried out, finding a great influence of four elementary reactions on the laminar burning speed. Adjusting the parameters of the four elementary reactions, a new model was obtained, being in good agreement with the experimental values.

HTML全文

图 1 层流燃烧测试系统示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of laminar combustion test

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同掺混比下火焰传播图像（P=0.1MPa，T=470K，Φ=1.0）

Figure 2. Flame propagation images under different blending ratios（P=0.1MPa，T=470K，

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同掺混比时的火焰传播速度与火焰拉伸率的关系

Figure 3. The relationship between stretched flame propagation speed and stretch rate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 T=470K、P=0.1MPa时不同掺混比下的层流火焰燃烧速度随当量比的变化

Figure 4. Laminar burning velocities with equivalent ratio of various blending ratios when T=470K、P=0.1MPa

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 初始机理的敏感性分析

Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis of the initial mechanism

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 修正后的机理与试验数据的对比

Figure 6. Comparison of the revised mechanism with experimental data

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 试验工况表

Table 1. Experimental initial condition

参数名称	数值
试验温度T/K	470
试验压力P_i/MPa	0.1
掺混比β	E0，E30，E60
当量比Φ	0.8，0.9，1.0，1.1，1.2，1.3，1.4

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 修正前后主要基元反应系数的对比

Table 2. Comparison of Modified Primitive Response Coefficients

基元反应	原模型参数			修正后的模型参数			参考文献
基元反应	A	n	E_a	A	n	E_a	参考文献
CO+OH=CO₂+H	7.02E+04	2.1	-355.7	1.40E+05	1.9	-2347.7	^[27]
HCO+O₂=CO+HO₂	7.58E+12	0.0	410.0	3.00E+12	0.0	0.0	^[28]
C₃H₆+H=C₃H₅-A+H₂	3.64E+05	2.5	4361.2	5.00E+12	0.0	1505.7	^[29]
H+O₂(+M)=HO₂(+M)	4.65E+12	0.44	0.0	5.80E+12	0.4	0.0	^[30]

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(32)

[1]	肖献法. 国务院《2030年前碳达峰行动方案》给交通运输、汽车等行业定调[J]. 商用汽车, 2021(11): 16-22. XIAO Xianfa. The state council's action plan for carbon dioxide peak before 2030 sets the tone for transportation, automobile and other industries[J]. Commercial Vehicle, 2021(11): 16-22. (in Chinese)
[2]	赵琳, 刘文峰, 李斌, 等. 政策导向下的新能源公交车节能减排效果评估[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2016, 36(增刊2): 99-102. ZHAO Lin, LIU Wenfeng, LI Bin, et al. Evaluation on energy-saving and emission-reduction results of new energy buses based on policy guidance[J]. Transactions of Beijing institute of Technology, 2016, 36(S2): 99-102. (in Chinese)
[3]	何旭, 张志鹏, 吴昊, 等. 基于二维激光诱导炽光法的棉籽油扩散火焰碳烟生成特性[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2019, 39(3): 235-240, 326. HE Xu, ZHANG Zhipeng, WU Hao, et al. Investigation on the soot formation of cottonseed oil diffusion flame by two-dimensional laser induced incandescence[J]. Transactions of Beijing institute of Technology, 2019, 39(3): 235-240, 326. (in Chinese)
[4]	FOONG T M, MORGANTI K J, BREAR M J, et al. The effect of charge cooling on the ron of ethanol/gasoline blends [J]. Sae International Journal of Fuels & Lubricants, 2013, 6(1): 34-43.
[5]	YANG Q, LIU Z, HOU X, et al. Measurements of laminar flame speeds and flame instability analysis of E30-air premixed flames at elevated temperatures and pressures [J]. Fuel, 2020, 259: 116223.
[6]	范学军, 俞刚. 大庆RP-3航空煤油热物性分析 [J]. 推进技术, 2006, 27(2): 187-192. FANG Xuejun , YU Gang. Analysis of the mophysical properties of Daqing RP-3 aviation kerosene [J]. Journal of Propulsion TechnologY, 2006, 27(2): 187-192. (in Chinese)
[7]	肖保国, 杨顺华, 赵慧勇, 等. RP-3航空煤油燃烧的详细和简化化学动力学模型 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2010, 25(9): 1948-1955. XIAO Baoguo, YANG Shunhua, ZHAO Huiyong, et al. Detailed and reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for RP-3aviation kerosene combustion [J]. Journal of Aeronautical Dynamics, 2010, 25(9): 1948-1955. (in Chinese)
[8]	ZHANG R L, JIN J, LE J L. The simulation of endothermic fuel flow in cooling channels of Scramjet [J].
[9]	曾文, 刘靖, 张治博, 等. 一种新的RP-3航空煤油模拟替代燃料 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(10): 2314-2320. ZENG Weng, LIU Jing, ZHANG Zhibo, et al. A new surrogate fuel of RP-3 kerosene [J]. Journal of Aeronautical Dynamics, 2017, 32(10): 2314-2320. (in Chinese)
[10]	曾文, 陈欣, 马洪安, 等. RP-3航空煤油层流燃烧特性的实验 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2015, 30(12): 2888-2896. ZENG Weng, CHEN Xin, MA Hongan, et al. Experiment on laminar combustion characteristics of RP-3 kerosene [J]. Journal of Aeronautical Dynamics, 2015, 30(12): 2888-2896. (in Chinese)
[11]	MA H, XIE M, ZENG W, et al. Experimental study on combustion characteristics of Chinese RP-3 kerosene [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016, 29(2): 375-385.
[12]	LIU J, HU E, ZENG W, et al. A new surrogate fuel for emulating the physical and chemical properties of RP-3 kerosene [J]. Fuel, 2020: 259: 116210.
[13]	DAGAUT P. On the kinetics of hydrocarbons oxidation from natural gas to kerosene and diesel fuel [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2002, 4(11): 2079-2094.
[14]	DAGAUT P, EL BAKALI A, RISTORI A. The combustion of kerosene: Experimental results and kinetic modelling using 1- to 3-component surrogate model fuels [J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(7-8): 944-956.
[15]	DOOLEY S, WON S H, CHAOS M, et al. A jet fuel surrogate formulated by real fuel properties [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(12): 2333-2339.
[16]	DOOLEY S, WON S H, HEYNE J, et al. The experimental evaluation of a methodology for surrogate fuel formulation to emulate gas phase combustion kinetic phenomena [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(4): 1444-1466.
[17]	XIOURIS C, YE T, JAYACHANDRAN J, et al. Laminar flame speeds under engine-relevant conditions: Uncertainty quantification and minimization in spherically expanding flame experiments [J]. Combustion & Flame, 2016, 163: 270-283.
[18]	GIANNAKOPOULOS G K, GATZOULIS A, FROUZAKIS C E, et al. Consistent definitions of “Flame Displacement Speed” and “Markstein Length” for premixed flame propagation [J]. Combustion & Flame, 2015, 162(4): 1249-1264.
[19]	CLAVIN P. Dynamic behavior of premixed flame fronts in laminar and turbulent flows [J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1985, 11(1): 1-59.
[20]	张艳群, 孟凡荣. MATLAB在图像边缘检测中的应用 [J]. 计算机应用研究, 2004, (06): 144-146. ZHANG Yanqun, MENG Fanrong. Application of MATLAB in I mage Edge Detection [J]. Application Research of Computers, 2004, (06): 144-146.
[21]	MARKSTEIN G H. Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Flame-Front Stability [J]. Dynamics of Curved Fronts, 1988: 413-423.
[22]	KELLEY A P, LAW C K. Nonlinear effects in the extraction of laminar flame speeds from expanding spherical flames [J]. Combustion & Flame, 2009, 156(9): 1844-1851.
[23]	MARKSTEIN G H. Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Flame-Front Stability [J]. Dynamics of Curved Fronts, 1988: 413-423.
[24]	YU W, YANG W, TAY K, et al. Development of a new skeletal mechanism for decalin oxidation under engine relevant conditions [J]. Fuel, 2018, 212: 41-48.
[25]	ZHENG C. On the accuracy of laminar flame speeds measured from outwardly propagating spherical flames: Methane/air at normal temperature and pressure [J]. Combustion & Flame, 2015, 162(6): 2442-2453.
[26]	MOFFAT R J. Describing the uncertainties in experimental results [J]. Experimental Thermal & Fluid Science, 1988, 1(1): 3-17.
[27]	LI Q, HU E, YU C, et al. Measurements of laminar flame speeds and flame instability analysis of 2-methyl-1-butanol–air mixtures [J]. Fuel, 2013, 112(3): 263-271.
[28]	FISHER E M, PITZ W J, CURRAN H J, et al. Detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms for combustion of oxygenated fuels [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2000, 28(2): 1579-1586.
[29]	RANZI E, FRASSOLDATI A, STAGNI A, et al. Reduced kinetic schemes of complex reaction systems: fossil and biomass-derived transportation fuels [J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2014, 46(9): 512-542.
[30]	钟北京, 姚文斐. 基于特征值分析的正癸烷骨架和总包简化机理 [J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(2): 210-216. ZHONG Beijing, YAO Wenfei. Simplified mechanism of n-decane skeleton and general package based on eigenvalue analysis [J]. Acta Physical Chemistry, 2014, 46(9): 512-542. (in Chinese)
[31]	CAI L, PITSCH H. Optimized chemical mechanism for combustion of gasoline surrogate fuels [J]. Combustion & Flame, 2015, 162(5): 1623-1637.
[32]	METCALFE W K, BURKE S M, AHMED S S, et al. A hierarchical and comparative kinetic modeling study of C1− C2 hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels [J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2013, 45(10): 638-675.