COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND ROUTES ACROSS EAST AFRICAN RIFT VALLEY—TAKE THE NAIROBI-MALABAR RAILWAY FOR EXAMPLE
-
摘要: 内罗毕—马拉巴铁路工程是东非“北方走廊”的重要组成部分，是非洲内陆国家发展经济的主干线。铁路线路工程穿越的东非大裂谷，地质复杂、火山地貌、断裂带和拉张裂缝等不良地质极为发育，而东非大裂谷铁路工程建设的研究资料十分匮乏。为了研究穿越东非大裂谷的铁路线路，本文首先介绍了东非大裂谷地形、地貌、裂谷的发育机理、区域断裂分布，然后以铁路沿线经济控制点为主轴，制定了穿越东非大裂谷铁路线路3大通道。分别对线路3大通道穿越的地形、地貌比选，穿越的地层、断裂和地裂缝比选，穿越地震、火山发育比选以及穿越的不良地质灾害比选，最后比选各线路通道的投资以及优、缺点，最终推荐南线通道方案。该线路方案得到肯尼亚政府的肯定和采纳。目前内马铁路正试运营，实践表明内马铁路裂谷段选线是较为成功的，可为同类工程提供借鉴。Abstract: The Nairobi-Malabar railway project is an important part of the "northern corridor" of East Africa. It is the trunk line of economic development in landlocked African countries. The railway line works pass through the rift valley. The volcanic landform, the fault belt and the tension fracture are extremely development. However, there is a lack of research data on railway construction in the rift valley. To study railway lines through the rift valley, firstly, this paper introduces the topography, landform, development mechanism and regional fault distribution of the east African rift valley, and then formulates three major railway routes through the east African rift valley based on the economic control points along the railway. We had compared the terrain and landform traversed by the three major routes, the stratum, fault and ground fractures, the earthquake and volcanic developments, and the adverse geological disasters. Finally, the investment, advantages and disadvantages of each route had been compared, and finally the southern route scheme was recommended. The scheme of the route was approved and adopted by the Kenyan government. At present, the Nairobi Malaba railway is in trial operation, and the practice shows that the selection of the rift section of Nairobi-Malabar railway is relatively successful, which can provide reference for similar projects.
-
Key words:
- The Nei-Ma Railway /
- The Great Rift Valley of East Africa /
- Route selection /
- Fault belt
-
图 2 东非裂谷系板块图(Chorowicz，2005)
Figure 2. East African rift valley plate map(Chorowicz, 2005)
图 3 东非大裂谷三联点结构(Chorowicz，2005)
Figure 3. The rift valley triad structure(Chorowicz, 2005)
图 5 东非大裂谷地质构造图(Zielke et al., 2009)
Figure 5. Tectonic map of the great rift valley (Zielke et al., 2009)
表 1 工程量对比较表
Table 1. Quantity comparison table of works
项目 中线 南线 总线路长 525.2 km 489.57 km 铺轨工程 正线 525.2 km 489.57 km 站线 60.4 km 51.6 km 路基土方 区间 5166.2×104 m3 5401.9×104 m3 站场 899.6×104 m3 766.4×104 m3 桥梁工程 特大桥 80座，105127.9 m 70座，84514.9 m 大中桥 77座，24148.9 m 47座，17321.5 m 隧道工程 小于1 km 34座，20 480 m 14座，9990 m 1~2 km 8座，10 650 m 10座，12 690 m 2~3 km 1座，2110 m 2座，4540 m 3~4 km 4座，13 010 m 1座，3820 m 大于4 km 2座，12 010 m 1座，5060 m 桥隧合计 187.54 km 137.94 km 工程造价 437 058.68万美元 359 788.38万美元 
下载: 导出CSV
-
Baker B H, Wohlenberg J. 1971. Structure and evolution of the Kenya rift valley[J]. Nature, 229(5286): 538-542. doi: 10.1038/229538a0 Chorowicz J. 2005. The East African rift system[J]. Journal of African Earth Science, 43(1-3): 379-410. doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.019 Ebinger C J. 1989. Tectonic development of the western branch of the East African rift system[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 101(7): 885-903. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0885:TDOTWB>2.3.CO;2 Feng M H. 2007. Construction and engineering geology siting for the Qinghai-Tibet railwayfeng[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 15(SII): 33-37. Gregory J W. 1986. The great rift valley[M]. London: John Murray: 422. He Z N. 1987. Preliminary discussion on the problem of railway line selection in active fault zone[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, (3): 195-203. Kampunzu A B, Popoff M. 1991. Distribution of the main phanerozoic African Rifts and associated magmatism: Introductory notes[C]//Magmatism in Extensional Structural Settings. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer: 2-10. Li G H. 2004. Wu-Guang railway line selecting by geology in Da-Yaou Mountain district[J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying, 30 (6): 33-34, 37. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tlhc200406011 Li J C. 2009. Engineering geological route selection of Qinghai-Tibet railway[M]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University Press. Li X J, Zhou Z H, et al. 2016. Seismic hazard analysis report for the CK0-CK120 section of the Nairobi-Malaba Railway in Kenya[R]. Beijing: Institute of Crustal Stress, China Earthquake Administration, Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Nanjing University of Technology. Morley C K. 1989. Extension detachments and sedimentation in continental rifts(particular reference to East Africa)[J]. Tectonics, 8(6): 1175-1192. doi: 10.1029/TC008i006p01175 Qian J, Liu H J, Yu Q H, et al. 2009. Permafrost engineering geological characteristic and discussion of route selection in Qinghai-Tibet plateau[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 17(4): 508-515. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gcdzxb200904012 Ring U. 2014. The East African fift system[J]. Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences, 107(1): 132-146. Wen Z X, Tong X G, Zhang G Y, et al. 2012. Petroleum geology features and exploration potential of basin group in east African rift system[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, (4): 60-65. Xu Z L, Li G H, Xu Z Y, et al. 2002. Assessment of regional crust stability of south Shandong province and site selection for Jiaoxin railway[j]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 10(2): 210-215. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gcdzxb200202019 Yu X D. 2018. Route selection by engineering geological in east Africa rift valley section of the railway from Nairobi to Malaba in Kenya[J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying, (4): 113-116. Zhang J M, Feng X. 2019. A comparative study on routing of nairobi-Malabar railway in Kenya[J]. Railway Freight Transport, (3): 54-58. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tdhy201903011 Zhou L Z. 2018. Application of geological route selection in the south extension line of hummer railway[J]. Gansu Technology, 34(16): 84-85. Zielke O, Strecker M R. 2009. Recurrence of large earthquakes in magmatic continental rifts: insights from a paleoseismic study along the laikipia-marmanet fault, Subukia Valley, Kenya Rift[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99(1): 61-70. doi: 10.1785/0120080015 丰明海. 2007.青藏铁路建设与工程地质选线[J].工程地质学报, 15(SII): 33-37. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=HY000002769719 何振宁. 1987.活动断裂带铁路选线问题初探[J].铁道工程学报, (3): 195-203. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/291830 李光辉. 2004.新建武广铁路大瑶山区地质选线[J].铁道勘察, 30(6): 33-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7479.2004.06.011 李金城. 2009.青藏铁路工程地质选线[M].兰州:兰州大学出版社. 李小军, 周正华, 等. 2016.肯尼亚内罗毕—马拉巴铁路CK0-CK120段地震危险性分析报告[R].北京: 中国地震局地壳应力研究所, 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 南京工业大学. 钱进, 刘厚健, 俞祁浩, 等. 2009.青藏高原冻土工程地质特性与选线原则探讨[J].工程地质学报, 17(4): 508-515. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2009.04.012 温志新, 童晓光, 张光亚, 等. 2012.东非裂谷系盆地群石油地质特征及勘探潜力[J].中国石油勘探, (4): 60-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2012.04.010 许再良, 李国和, 许兆义, 等. 2002.鲁南地区区域地壳稳定性评价与胶新铁路地质选线[J].工程地质学报, 10(2): 210-215. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2002.02.019 俞晓东. 2018.肯尼亚内马铁路东非大裂谷段工程地质选线[J].铁道勘察, (4): 113-116. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tlhc201804028 张健明, 冯旭. 2019.肯尼亚内罗毕至马拉巴铁路通道研究[J].铁道货运, (3): 54-58. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tdhy201903011 周志立. 2018.地质选线在瓮马铁路南延伸线中的应用[J].甘肃科技, 34 (16): 84-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2018.16.030 -
下载:
点击查看大图
图(11) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 248
- HTML全文浏览量: 103
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
京公网安备 11010502036328号 京ICP备17033152号