Hybrid Reliability Approach for Airbag Seat Protection Performance Based on Probability and Probability Box Models
-
摘要: 针对不确定因素对载人空降气囊座椅防护性能的影响,提出一种基于概率-概率盒混合模型的气囊座椅防护特性可靠性分析方法。研制空降乘员气囊座椅,并建立相应的“假人-座椅”数值分析模型,通过开展装备落地碰撞试验对数值模型进行试验验证;然后,根据可靠性问题中的混合不确定性变量,在概率-概率盒混合模型基础上构建适用于气囊座椅防护特性的可靠性分析模型,并借助等概率变换和不确定性变量的区间分析将原始的双层嵌套的优化问题转化成单层优化问题,实现循环嵌套优化问题的解耦,从而提高可靠性指标的求解效率;最后,采用近似模型技术和隔代映射遗传算法完成对可靠性指标的高效求解。结果表明,该方法能有效对气囊座椅的防护特性进行可靠性评估,在装备空降技术领域具有一定的实际工程意义。Abstract: Considering the influence of uncertainties on protection performance of airbag seat in manned airdrop, a hybrid reliability approach based on probability and probability box models is presented for the protection performance. Firstly, the airbag seat is developed and the numerical model of the "dummy-seat" is established, which is verified by the real equipment airdrop experiment. Then, according to the mixed uncertainty variables in the reliability problem, a reliability analysis model of airbag seat protection characteristics based on probability and probability box hybrid model is constructed. Through equal probability transformation and interval analysis of uncertain variables, the original double-layer nested optimization problem is transformed into a single-layer optimization problem to realize the decoupling of nested optimization problem. Based on this decoupling strategy, the efficiency of solving reliability index could be improved. Finally, the approximate model technology and intergeneration projection genetic algorithm (IP-GA) are adopted to obtained the reliability index. The results demonstrate that the proposed method could effectively evaluate the reliability of protection performance of airbag seat. The method can also be used in the field of other airdrop protections.
-
Key words:
- airbag seat /
- manned airdrop /
- hybrid model /
- reliability analysis
-
表 1 座椅材料尼龙66的物理参数
弹性模量
E/MPa泊松比
$ \nu $密度
ρ/(kg/m3)屈服应力
σs/MPa渗透
因子300 0.2 6.78×102 55 0 表 2 概率盒变量Y2累积分布函数(工况一)
区间和质量 [0, 0.015], 0.3 [0.005, 0.025], 0.2 [0.02, 0.035], 0.2 [0.03, 0.05], 0.3 表 3 随机变量分布类型(工况一)
随机变量 分布参数1 分布参数2 分布类型 X1/kg 0.196 2 0.039 2 对数正态分布 X2/Pa 51 808.406 7 25 904.203 3 对数正态分布 表 4 可靠性指标计算结果(工况一)
随机变量 不确定变量 可靠性指标值 失效概率 X1/kg X2/Pa Y1/m2 Y2/kg 2.380 55 520 0.010 81 0 ${\beta ^L}{\text{ = }}2.511\;5$ 6.01×10−3 2.351 56 010 0.010 85 0 ${\beta ^R}{\text{ = }}5.580$ 1.203×10−8 表 5 随机变量分布类型(工况二)
随机变量 分布参数1 分布参数2 分布类型 X1/kg 0.196 2 0.001 962 对数正态分布 X2/Pa 51 808.406 7 51.808 4 正态分布 表 6 可靠性指标计算结果(工况二)
随机变量 不确定变量 可靠性指标值 失效概率 X1/kg X2/Pa Y1/m2 Y2/kg 3.788 1×10−5 0.015 86 0.968 7 ${\beta ^L}{\text{ = }}3.607\;6$ 1.545×10−4 3.597 61 580 0.013 47 0.024 44 ${\beta ^R}{\text{ = }}10.172\;7$ 1.313×10−24 表 7 可靠性指标计算结果(工况三)
随机变量 不确定变量 可靠性指标值 失效概率 X1/kg X2/Pa Y1/m2 Y2/kg 3.983 1×10−5 0.007 826 0.374 4 ${\beta ^L}{\text{ = 4}}{\text{.019}}\;{\text{1}}$ 2.921×10−5 3.983 1×10−5 0.007 846 0.373 4 ${\beta ^R}{\text{ = 5}}{\text{.466}}$ 2.302×10−8 -
[1] 刘鑫, 张志勇. 基于气囊缓冲的载人空降乘员防护装置优化设计[J]. 机械工程学报, 2012, 48(21): 168-174. http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/Y2012/V48/I21/168LIU Xin, ZHANG Zhiyong. Optimal design of passenger's protection devices in manned airdrop based on airbag cushion[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 48(21): 168-174. http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/Y2012/V48/I21/168 [2] 谢燕, 雷勇军, 李道奎. 缓冲座椅系统着陆冲击响应的研究与分析[J]. 中国空间科学技术, 2007(6): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKJ200706010.htmXIE Yan, LEI Yongjun, LI Daokui. Investigation and analysis for landing impact on buffer seat system[J]. Chinese Space Science and Technology, 2007(6): 37-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKJ200706010.htm [3] HEYMSFIELD E, FASANELLA E L, HARDY R C, et al. Assessment of soil modeling capability for Orion contingency land landing[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 25(1): 125-131. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000089 [4] 谢燕, 蒋建平, 雷勇军, 等. 飞船返回舱座椅着陆缓冲系统的局部改进模型[J]. 振动与冲击, 2006, 25(8): 785-787.XIE Yan, JIANG Jianping, LEI Yongjun, et al. Improvement model of seat-buffer landing system in manned spacecraft return cabin[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2006, 25(8): 785-787. [5] 谭军, 韩旭, 刘鑫. 载人防护缓冲气囊座椅的优化设计[J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(2): 222-225. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201102047.htmTAN Jun, HAN Xu, LIU Xin. Optimal design of airbag chair for manned airdrop protection[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(2): 222-225. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDCJ201102047.htm [6] LIU X, ZHANG Z Y, ZHAO Z H, The uncertain optimisation of buffering characteristics of landing airbag in manned airdrop[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2013, 18(3): 225-236. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2013.775738 [7] 张义民, 孙志礼. 机械产品的可靠性大纲[J]. 机械工程学报, 2014, 50(14): 14-20. http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/Y2014/V50/I14/14ZHANG Yimin, SUN Zhili. The reliability syllabus of mechanical products[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 50(14): 14-20. http://www.cjmenet.com.cn/CN/Y2014/V50/I14/14 [8] 谢里阳. 机械可靠性理论、方法及模型中若干问题评述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2014, 50(14): 27-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201414004.htmXIE Liyang. Issues and commentary on mechanical reliability theories, methods and models[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 50(14): 27-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201414004.htm [9] INUIGUCHI M, RAMIK J. Possibilistic linear programming: A brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 111 (1): 3-28. [10] 刘鑫, 尹来容, 胡林. 基于概率-椭球混合模型的缓冲气囊防护特性可靠性分析方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56 (2): 130-137. doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.02.130LIU Xin, YIN Lairong, HU Lin. Hybrid reliability approach for airbag protection performance based on probability and ellipsoidal convex models[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56 (2): 130-137. doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.02.130 [11] WILLIAMSON R C, DOWNS T. Probabilistic arithmetic Ⅰ: Numerical methods for calculating convolutions and dependency bounds[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1990(4): 89-158. [12] DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J]. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38: 325-339. [13] 李彦锋, 黄洪钟, 黄意贤. 太阳翼驱动机构的故障模式影响分析与时变可靠性研究[J]. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(5): 108-115. doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.05.108LI Yanfeng, HUANG Hongzhong, HUANG Yixian. Failure mode and effects analysis and time varying reliability of solar array drive assembly[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(5): 108-115. doi: 10.3901/JME.2020.05.108 [14] JIANG C, YAN Y F, WANG D P, et al. Global and local Kriging limit state approximation for time-dependent reliability-based design optimization through wrong- classification probability[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021, 208: 107431. [15] LIU G R, HAN X. Computational Inverse Techniques in Nondestructive Evaluation[M]. Florida: CRC Press, 2003. [16] BOSTROM O, FREDRIKSSON R, HALAND Y. Comparison of car seats in low speed rear-end impacts using the BioRID dummy and the new neck injury criterion (NIC)[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2000, 32(2): 321-328. [17] RACKWITZ R, FLESSLER B. Structural reliability under combined random load sequences[J]. Computers & Structures, 1978, 9(5): 489-494. [18] FU C, XU Y, JIANG C, et al. Improved differential evolution with shrinking space technique for constrained optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 30(3): 553-565. [19] LIU X, LIU X, ZHOU Z, et al. An efficient multi-objective optimization method based on the adaptive approximation model of the radial basis function[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 63(3): 1385-1403. [20] XU Y G, LIU G R, WU Z P. A novel hybrid genetic algorithm using local optimizer based on heuristic pattern move[J]. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2001, 15(7): 601-613. [21] LIU X, ZHANG Z Y, ZHAO Z H, The uncertain optimisation of buffering characteristics of landing airbag in manned airdrop[J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2013, 18(3): 225-236.