留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于AOAC法对Englyst法测定粳米淀粉消化特性的优化

高嫚 贾健辉 周迅 张楚佳 窦博鑫 刘颖 张娜

高嫚,贾健辉,周迅,等. 基于AOAC法对Englyst法测定粳米淀粉消化特性的优化[J]. 食品工业科技,2023,44(10):264−269. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070100
引用本文: 高嫚,贾健辉,周迅,等. 基于AOAC法对Englyst法测定粳米淀粉消化特性的优化[J]. 食品工业科技,2023,44(10):264−269. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070100
GAO Man, JIA Jianhui, ZHOU Xun, et al. Optimization of Englyst Method for Determination of Starch Digestibility of Japonica Rice Based on AOAC Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(10): 264−269. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070100
Citation: GAO Man, JIA Jianhui, ZHOU Xun, et al. Optimization of Englyst Method for Determination of Starch Digestibility of Japonica Rice Based on AOAC Method[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(10): 264−269. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070100

基于AOAC法对Englyst法测定粳米淀粉消化特性的优化

doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070100
基金项目: 黑龙江省“百千万”工程科技重大专项(2020ZX08B02);国家自然科学基金面上项目(32072258);国家重点研发计划(2021YFD2100902-3);中央财政支持地方高校发展专项资金优秀青年人才支持计划项目。
详细信息
    作者简介:

    高嫚(1999−)(ORCID:0000−0002−8599−7676),女,硕士研究生,研究方向:谷物加工,E-mail:2050553953@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    刘颖(1968−)(ORCID:0000−0002−9011−2465),女,博士,教授,研究方向:植物蛋白工程与营养功能因子研究,E-mail:154057693@qq.com

    张娜(1979−)(ORCID:0000−0002−5706−641X),女,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:食品蛋白与食品安全,E-mail:foodzhangna@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TS210.1

Optimization of Englyst Method for Determination of Starch Digestibility of Japonica Rice Based on AOAC Method

  • 摘要: 研究较快速、准确测定粳米淀粉消化特性的方法。以粳米淀粉为试验对象,AOAC法(AOAC Official Method 2002.02)测定结果为基准,对Englyst法的酶解反应时间、混合酶比例、混合酶的添加量、混合酶pH等试验条件进行优化,得到适合粳米淀粉消化特性测定的方法,并对该方法测定结果进行准确度、精密度分析。结果表明,当酶解时间为270 min、混合酶比例[α-胰腺淀粉酶(AMY):淀粉葡萄糖苷酶(AMG)]为10:1、混合酶添加量为AMY(3600 U)+AMG(360 U)、混合酶pH为6.0、样品不经糊化处理时,测得的粳米淀粉中RS含量2.13%±0.05%与AOAC法测定结果2.02%±0.06%无显著差异,并且其测定时间由AOAC法的16 h调整为270 min,大大缩短了试验时间;与原Englyst方法相比,改进后的Englyst法测得的结果2.13%±0.05%准确度和精密度高,重现性好。因此,改进后的Englyst法可以快速、准确地测定粳米淀粉的消化特性。

     

  • 图  不同酶解时间下样液中葡萄糖含量的变化

    Figure  1.  Variation of glucose content in enzymeolysis solution under different time

    表  1  两种方法测定抗性淀粉含量的比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of two methods for determining the content of resistant starch

    样品AOAC法
    RS含量(%)
    标准差变异系数
    (%)
    Englyst法
    RS含量(%)
    标准差变异系数
    (%)
    标准品10.780.023.851.260.129.52
    标准品24.980.051.007.100.567.89
    标准品336.710.772.1040.331.954.84
    粳米淀粉2.020.062.974.190.307.16
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  混合酶比例对Englyst法测定结果的影响

    Table  2.   Effect of mixed enzyme ratio on the determination results of Englyst method

    混合酶比例(AMY:AMG)RDS(%)SDS(%)RS(%)
    20:120.68±0.19c73.03±0.58a6.29±0.17a
    15:124.97±0.21b70.87±0.51b4.16±0.12b
    10:129.49±0.25a68.38±0.51c2.13±0.05c
    7.5:129.80±0.27a68.06±0.51c2.14±0.08c
    5:130.06±0.32a67.75±0.43c2.19±0.08c
    注:不同小写字母表示各组存在显著差异,P<0.05,下同。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  混合酶添加量对Englyst法测定结果的影响

    Table  3.   Effect of mixed enzyme addition on the determination results of Englyst method

    混合酶添加量RDS(%)SDS(%)RS(%)
    AMY(600 U)+AMG(60 U)17.52±0.08d48.85±0.29d33.63±0.49a
    AMY(1800 U)+AMG(180 U)21.87±0.20c56.71±0.37c21.42±0.25b
    AMY(3600 U)+AMG(360 U)29.49±0.25a68.38±0.47a2.13±0.05d
    AMY(4800 U)+AMG(480 U)29.26±0.28b68.24±0.43b2.50±0.09c
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  混合酶pH对Englyst法测定结果的影响

    Table  4.   Effect of mixed enzyme pH on the determination results of Englyst method

    混合酶pHRDS(%)SDS(%)RS(%)
    5.219.35±0.17c60.32±0.30c20.33±0.11a
    6.029.49±0.25a68.38±0.47b2.13±0.05c
    6.926.08±0.31b69.35±0.39a4.57±0.05b
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  原料预处理对Englyst法测定结果的影响

    Table  5.   Effect of raw material pretreatment on the determination results of Englyst method

    原料预处理方式RDS(%)SDS(%)RS(%)
    糊化41.56±0.30a57.39±0.38b1.05±0.02b
    不糊化29.49±0.25b68.38±0.47a2.13±0.05a
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  AOAC法、Englyst法及改进后的Englyst法测定结果比较

    Table  6.   Comparison of determination results of AOAC method, Englyst method and Englyst improved method

    测定方法RS含量(%)变异系数(%)
    AOAC法2.02±0.06b2.97
    Englyst法4.19±0.30a7.16
    改进后的Englyst法2.13±0.05b2.35
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 芦鑫, 张晖, 姚惠源. 不同提取方法对粳米淀粉结构的影响[J]. 食品科学,2008,29(1):102−106. [LU Xin, ZHANG Hui, YAO Huiyuan. Effects of different extraction methods on the structure of japonica rice starch[J]. Food Science,2008,29(1):102−106.
    [2] REBEIRA S P, PRASANTHA B D R, JAYATILAKE D V, et al. A comparative study of dietary fiber content, in vitro starch digestibility and cooking quality characteristics of pigmented and non-pigmented traditional and improved rice[J]. Food Research International,2022,157:111389. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111389
    [3] CHENG Z H, LI J N, QIAO D L, et al. Microwave reheating enriches resistant starch in cold-chain cooked rice: A view of structural alterations during digestion[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2022,208:80−87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.034
    [4] ZHENG J, HUANG S, ZHAO R Y, et al. Effect of four viscous soluble dietary fibers on the physicochemical, structural properties, and in vitro digestibility of rice starch: A comparison study[J]. Food Chemistry,2021,362:130181. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130181
    [5] BIAN J L, REN G L, FANG-FU X U, et al. Comparison of grain yield and quality of different types of japonica rice cultivars in the northern Jiangsu plain, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2021,20(8):2065−2076. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63348-2
    [6] 丁国华, 白良明, 孙世臣, 等. 黑龙江省国审水稻品种龙稻115的选育[J]. 中国种业,2020,05:61−62. [DING Guohua, BAI Liangming, SUN Shichen, et al. Breeding of Longdao 115, a national approved rice variety in Heilongjiang Province[J]. China seed industry,2020,05:61−62.
    [7] 米红波, 邓婷月, 李毅, 等. 抗性淀粉的消化特性及其在食品中的应用[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2021,40(9):9−15. [MI Hongbo, DENG Tingyue, LI Yi, et al. Digestive characteristics of resistant starch and its application in food[J]. Journal of Food and Biotechnology,2021,40(9):9−15.
    [8] 张婧婷. 抗性淀粉的类型及其制备技术研究进展[J]. 现代面粉工业,2021,35(6):26−33. [ZHANG Jingting. Research progress on types and preparation technology of resistant starch[J]. Modern Flour Industry,2021,35(6):26−33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5280.2021.06.007
    [9] YI X, LI C. Main controllers for improving the resistant starch content in cooked white rice[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2022,122:107083. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107083
    [10] GUO Y X, ZHANG W H, SUN Y S, et al. Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation combined with liquid chromatography enables rapid, quantitative, and structurally informative detection of resistant starch[J]. Microchemical Journal,2022,181:107787. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.107787
    [11] HE H, CHI C D, XIE F W, et al. Improving the in vitro digestibility of rice starch by thermomechanically assisted complexation with guar gum[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2020,102:105637. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105637
    [12] ENGLYST H N, KINGMAN S M, CUMMINGS J H. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions[J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,1992,46:S33−S50.
    [13] BERRY C S. Resistant starch: formation and measurement of starch that survives exhaustive digestion with amylolytic enzymes during the determination of dietary fibre[J]. Journal of Cereal Science,1986,4(4):301−314. doi: 10.1016/S0733-5210(86)80034-0
    [14] BJORCK I, NYMAN M, PEDERSEN B, et al. On the digestibility of starch in wheat bread-studies in vitro and in vivo[J]. Journal of Cereal Science,1986,4:1−11. doi: 10.1016/S0733-5210(86)80002-9
    [15] GONI I, GARCIA-DIZ L, MANAS E, et al. Analysis of resistant starch: a method for foods and food products[J]. Food Chemistry,1996,56(4):445−449. doi: 10.1016/0308-8146(95)00222-7
    [16] CHAMP M. Determination of resistant starch in foods and food products: interlaboratory study[J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,1992,46(2):51−62.
    [17] AOAC. Resistant starch in starch and plant materials[S]. AOAC Official Method, 2002.
    [18] ZHANG Z N, ZHANG M Q, ZHANG B, et al. Radio frequency energy regulates the multi-scale structure, digestive and physicochemical properties of rice starch[J]. Food Bioscience,2022,47:101616. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101616
    [19] YOU H, LIANG C, ZHANG O L, et al. Variation of resistant starch content in different processing types and their starch granules properties in rice[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2022,276:118742. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118742
    [20] 芦俊峰, 吴建美, 尹幸念, 等. 马铃薯抗性淀粉对T2DM调节作用的研究进展[J]. 华南国防医学杂志,2022,36(4):316−319. [LU Junfeng, WU Jianmei, YIN Xingnian, et al. Research progress of potato resistant starch in regulating T2DM[J]. South China Journal of Defense Medicine,2022,36(4):316−319.
    [21] 郑宝东, 王琦, 郑亚凤, 等. 抗性淀粉的生物学功效及在食品加工中的应用[J]. 食品科学技术学报,2015,33(5):1−7. [ZHENG Baodong, WANG Qi, ZHENG Yafeng, et al. Biological efficacy of resistant starch and its application in food processing[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2015,33(5):1−7.
    [22] 严梅荣. 抗性淀粉测定方法的研究进展[J]. 食品科学,2006(4):251−254. [YAN Meirong. Research progress on determination methods of resistant starch[J]. Food Science,2006(4):251−254. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2006.04.063
    [23] 任娜梅, 马蓁, 胡新中. 抗性淀粉体外分析方法的优劣势比较及研究进展[J]. 中国粮油学报,2020,35(11):169−178. [REN Namei, MA Zhen, HU Xinzhong. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of in vitro analysis methods of resistant starch and research progress[J]. Chinese Journal of Grain and Oil,2020,35(11):169−178.
    [24] 周毅. 浅谈酶促反应方法与影响酶促反应速度的因素[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2014,5(23):71−72. [ZHOU Yi. Brief discussion on enzymatic reaction methods and factors affecting enzymatic reaction speed[J]. China Health Standard Management,2014,5(23):71−72.
    [25] 苑晓云, 曹庆芹, 秦岭, 等. 板栗抗性淀粉测定方法的优化[J]. 北京农学院学报,2017,32(3):38−41. [YUAN Xiaoyun, CAO Qingqin, QIN Ling, et al. Optimization of determination method of chestnut resistant starch[J]. Journal of Beijing Agricultural University,2017,32(3):38−41.
    [26] 李爱萍, 唐书泽, 张志森, 等. 大米抗性淀粉定量测定方法比较研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2006(1):195−197. [LI Aiping, TANG Shuze, ZHANG Zhisen, et al. Comparative study on quantitative determination methods of rice resistant starch[J]. Food Industry Science and Technology,2006(1):195−197. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0306.2006.01.064
    [27] 师德强, 吴光, 李检秀, 等. α-淀粉酶Amy7C及其突变体最适pH值的定量预测[J]. 广西科学,2014,21(6):664−670. [SHI Deqiang, WU Guang, LI Jianxiu, et al. α-Quantitative prediction of optimum pH value of amylase Amy 7C and its mutants[J]. Guangxi Science,2014,21(6):664−670. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9164.2014.06.017
    [28] MCCLEARY B V. Measurement of resistant starch and incorporation of resistant starch into dietary fibre measurements[M]. Resistant Starch, 2013: 131-144.
    [29] 范媛媛, 马青, 谭梅青, 等. 天然抗性淀粉测定方法的优化[J]. 现代食品科技,2013,29(5):1036−1039,960. [FAN Y Y, MA Q, TAN M Q, et al. Optimization of determination method of natural resistant starch[J]. Modern Food Technology,2013,29(5):1036−1039,960.
    [30] 熊春红, 谢明勇, 陈钢. 抗性淀粉研究综述[J]. 天然产物研究与开发,2007,19:708−717, 661. [XIONG Chunhong, XIE Mingyong, CHEN Gang. Review on research of resistant starch[J]. Research and Development of Natural Products,2007,19:708−717, 661. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6880.2007.04.040
    [31] 周颖, 邹彦平, 姜元荣, 等. 抗性淀粉测定方法探讨及预处理对宜糖米抗性淀粉质量分数的影响[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2017,36(4):416−419. [ZHOU Ying, ZOU Yanping, JIANG Yuanrong, et al. Discussion on the determination method of resistant starch and the effect of pretreatment on the mass fraction of resistant starch in sugar suitable rice[J]. Journal of Food and Biotechnology,2017,36(4):416−419.
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  42
  • HTML全文浏览量:  31
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-07-12
  • 刊出日期:  2023-05-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回