模糊数学评价与响应面结合研制黑蒜茶树菇酱及抗氧化活性分析

贾庆超; 王璇

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070366

模糊数学评价与响应面结合研制黑蒜茶树菇酱及抗氧化活性分析

doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070366

贾庆超^*, ,,
王璇

郑州科技学院食品科学与工程学院，河南郑州 450000

基金项目: 河南省教育厅高等学校重点研究项目（22B550021）；河南省大学生创新创业项目（s202012746022）；郑州科技学院2022年校级科研项目（2022XJKY08），郑州科技学院2023年大学生创新创业项目。

详细信息

作者简介:
贾庆超（1981−），男，硕士，副教授，研究方向：食品研究与开发，E-mail：someone0803@163.com

通讯作者:
贾庆超（1981−），男，硕士，副教授，研究方向：食品研究与开发，E-mail：someone0803@163.com

中图分类号: TS201.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 18
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-02
- 刊出日期: 2023-05-01

Study on Black Garlic Tea Tree Mushroom Sauce and Its Antioxidant Properties by Fuzzy Mathematics Evaluation and Response Surface Methodology

JIA Qingchao^{*
, ,},
WANG Xuan

School of Food Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou 450000, China

摘要

摘要: 以黑蒜、茶树菇和小米椒为主要原料，以感官评价为标准，采用单因素实验、模糊数学评价和响应面优化法，对黑蒜茶树菇酱的茶树菇、小米椒、植物油、食用盐、白糖、淀粉、葱姜蒜等原料配方进行优化，研究一款黑蒜酱制品，并将其与市售春玖源茶树菇酱进行抗氧化活性对比。结果表明：黑蒜茶树菇酱最佳配方为：黑蒜20 g，茶树菇18.05 g、小米椒3.49 g，植物油6.96 g、食用盐3.48 g、白糖1.16 g、淀粉2.32 g、葱姜蒜各1.16 g，感官评分为88.26分。黑蒜茶树菇酱与春玖源茶树菇酱对DPPH自由基、羟自由基、超氧阴离子自由基等均具有清除能力，对Fe³⁺具有还原能力，与体积浓度呈现正相关的量效关系，黑蒜茶树菇酱的清除能力和还原能力均优于市售春玖源茶树菇酱，当体积浓度达到1 mL/mL时，对DPPH自由基、羟自由基和超氧阴离子自由基的清除率分别达到了93.6%、75.9%和50.8%，对Fe³⁺还原能力也达到最大，说明制备的黑蒜茶树菇酱具有良好的抗氧化性。理化及微生物指标检测结果表明，水分含量52.35 g/100 g，总酸含量2.02 g/kg，菌落总数816.6 CFU/mL，亚硝酸盐含量2.53 mg/kg，大肠菌群未检出，以上指标均符合GB 31644-2018《食品安全国家标准复合调味料》国家相关要求。在此条件下，黑蒜和茶树菇香味醇厚，光泽鲜艳，酱体粘稠适中，是一款良好的酱制品，为黑蒜茶树菇酱的发展提供数据参考。
- 黑蒜 /
- 茶树菇 /
- 感官评价 /
- 抗氧化性 /
- 理化指标
Abstract: With black garlic, tea tree mushroom and millet pepper as the main raw materials, sensory evaluation as the standard, single factor experiment, fuzzy mathematical evaluation and response surface optimization were used to optimize the factors affecting black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce, such as tea tree mushroom, millet pepper, vegetable oil, edible salt, white sugar, starch, onion, ginger and garlic. A black garlic sauce product was studied and its antioxidant activity was compared with the commercially available Chunjiuyuan tea tree mushroom sauce. The results showed that the best preparation formula of black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce was: 20 g black garlic, 18.05 g tea tree mushroom, 3.49 g millet pepper, 6.96 g vegetable oil, 3.48 g salt, 1.16 g white sugar, 2.32 g starch, 1.16 g onion, ginger and garlic respectively, and the sensory score was 88.26 points. Black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce and Chunjiuyuan tea tree mushroom sauce had scavenging capacity for DPPH free radical, hydroxyl radical, superoxide anion radical, and reducing capacity for Fe³⁺, which had a positive dose effect relationship with the volume concentration. However, the scavenging capacity and reducing capacity of black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce were better than those of Chunjiuyuan tea tree mushroom sauce. When the volume concentration reached 1 mL/mL, the scavenging capacity of DPPH free radical, hydroxyl radical and superoxide anion radical were 93.6%, 75.9% and 50.8% respectively, and the reduction capacity of Fe³⁺ was also the largest, indicating that the prepared black garlic tea mushroom sauce had good antioxidant properties. The results of physicochemical and microbial indexes showed that the water content was 52.35 g/100 g, the total acid content was 2.02 g/kg, the total number of colonies was 816.6 CFU/mL, the nitrite content was 2.53 mg/kg, coliforms were not detected. The above indicators were in line with the relevant national requirements of GB 31644-2018 National food safety standard compound seasoning. Under this condition, black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce has mellow flavor, bright luster and moderate viscosity, providing data reference for the development of black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce.
- black garlic /
- tea tree mushroom /
- sensory evaluation /
- antioxidant activity /
- physicochemical indicators

HTML全文

图 1 单因素实验结果

注：A～G分别为：茶树菇、小米椒、植物油、食用盐、白糖、淀粉、葱姜蒜；不同字母表示差异显著（P<0.05）。

Figure 1. Single factor test results

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 黑蒜茶树菇酱感官评分响应面图

Figure 2. Response surface of sensory score of black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 DPPH·的清除能力

Figure 3. Scavenging ability of DPPH free radicals

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 羟自由基的清除能力

Figure 4. Scavenging ability of·OH free radicals

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 超氧阴离子自由基的清除能力

Figure 5. Scavenging ability of superoxide anion radical

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 V_C与黑蒜茶树菇酱的还原能力

Figure 6. Reduction ability of V_C and black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 对DPPH·、·OH、O₂⁻·的清除能力IC₅₀和Fe³⁺还原能力的OD_0.5值

Figure 7. IC₅₀ value of DPPH·、·OH、 O₂⁻· scavenging capacity and OD_0.5 value of Fe³⁺reduction capacity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 黑蒜茶树菇酱辅料正交试验因素水平设计

Table 1. Factor level design of orthogonal test for auxiliary ingredients of black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce

水平	因素
水平	A植物油（g）	B食用盐（g）	C白糖（g）	D淀粉（g）	E葱姜蒜（g）
1	4	1	0.5	1	0.8
2	6	2	1.0	2	1.0
3	8	3	1.5	3	1.2
4	10	4	2.0	4	1.4

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 黑蒜茶树菇酱响应面因素水平设计

Table 2. Level design of response surface factors for black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce

水平	因素
水平	A茶树菇（g）	B小米椒（g）	C辅料（份）
-1	10	2	0.8
0	15	3	1.0
1	20	4	1.2

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 黑蒜茶树菇酱感官评价标准

Table 3. Sensory evaluation criteria of black garlic tea tree mushroom sauce

项目	优V₁	良V₂	中V₃	差V₄
色泽U₁（25分）	酱体黄棕色或者红棕色，色泽均匀，油润发亮，明快饱满（20~25）	酱体颜色稍暗，呈深褐色，色泽不够明亮，较均匀（14~19）	酱体稍有光泽，不明亮，颜色均匀，但过深或过浅（8~13）	酱体颜色呈黑褐色，不均匀，无光泽（≤7）
状态U₂（20分）	酱体黏稠适中，颗粒大小均匀，能够清楚的看到茶树菇颗粒，无多余油脂，无杂质，无分层（15~20）	酱体稍稠或稍稀，稍有分层，无杂质，有茶树菇的颗粒，稍有漂浮的油脂，分布较均匀（10~14）	酱体较稠或较稀，有分层，无杂质，有油脂漂浮，茶树菇颗粒大小不一，颗粒分布不均匀（5~9）	酱体过稠或过稀，有分层，有杂质，有大块的茶树菇，漂浮油脂较多，颗粒不均匀（≤4）
滋味U₃（30分）	滋味鲜美，咸淡适中，黑蒜的香甜味以及茶树菇的鲜味浓厚，辣味可口，无其他不良滋味（24~30）	滋味较好，咸淡适中，黑蒜的香甜味以及茶树菇的鲜味适中，辣度较弱，可口，无其他不良滋味（16~23）	滋味一般，咸淡不适中，黑蒜的香甜味以及茶树菇的鲜味偏淡，辣味不明显，有轻微的其他异味（9~15）	滋味较差，咸淡不适中，无辣味或辣味过大，有焦糊味等其他不良气味（≤8）
气味U₄（25分）	酱香味较醇厚，有黑蒜的香甜味以及茶树菇的鲜味，无异味，整体协调（20~25）	整体气味较协调，黑蒜香甜味以及茶树菇的鲜味不够突出，稍平淡，无不良气味（14~19）	酱香味不明显，黑蒜香甜味以及茶树菇的鲜味不明显，稍有异味（8~13）	没有酱香味道，有其他不良气味如酸败味或焦糊味（≤7）

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 各因素权重分布

Table 4. Weight assignment of each factor

评价指标	各项因素得分
评价指标	滋味	气味	色泽	状态	总计	权重
滋味M₁	10	7	9	9	36	0.35
气味M₂	3	10	7	6	25	0.26
色泽M₃	1	3	10	5	14	0.19
状态M₄	1	4	5	10	26	0.20

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 正交试验各因素票数

Table 5. Number of votes for each factor of orthogonal test

序号	滋味				气味				色泽				状态
序号	优	良	中	差	优	良	中	差	优	良	中	差	优	良	中	差
1	3	3	2	2	3	2	3	2	2	3	2	3	2	2	4	2
2	8	1	1	0	7	1	1	1	8	0	2	0	8	2	0	0
3	5	3	1	1	5	2	3	0	5	4	1	0	5	3	2	0
4	3	1	3	3	3	2	2	3	1	3	2	4	2	2	2	4
5	3	3	3	1	3	3	3	1	3	3	2	2	3	3	3	1
6	4	4	2	0	4	3	3	0	3	4	1	2	3	3	3	1
7	6	3	1	0	5	5	0	0	5	3	2	0	5	3	1	1
8	7	2	1	0	6	2	2	0	6	3	1	0	6	2	2	0
9	2	2	2	4	2	1	3	4	2	2	3	3	2	2	4	2
10	3	2	2	3	3	2	2	3	2	2	3	3	2	2	3	3
11	4	2	2	2	4	1	2	3	3	3	3	1	3	3	4	0
12	6	4	0	0	7	3	0	0	6	3	1	0	6	2	2	0
13	3	2	1	4	2	2	3	3	2	3	2	3	2	2	2	4
14	4	2	2	1	5	1	3	1	5	1	1	3	3	2	2	3
15	6	3	1	0	6	2	2	0	6	4	0	0	6	4	0	0
16	5	2	2	1	4	2	2	2	4	2	2	2	3	3	3	1

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 正交试验结果分析

Table 6. Analysis of orthogonal experimental results

试验号	A	B	C	D	E	感官评分（分）
1	1	1	1	1	1	75.57
2	1	2	2	2	2	86.23
3	1	3	3	3	3	82.58
4	1	4	4	4	4	73.29
5	2	1	2	3	4	77.81
6	2	2	1	4	3	80.18
7	2	3	4	1	2	84.02
8	2	4	3	2	1	84.89
9	3	1	3	4	2	72.33
10	3	2	4	3	1	74.22
11	3	3	1	2	4	77.68
12	3	4	2	1	3	85.67
13	4	1	4	2	3	72.51
14	4	2	3	1	4	75.82
15	4	3	2	4	1	85.13
16	4	4	1	3	2	79.03
K₁	317.67	298.21	312.46	321.08	319.81
K₂	327.90	316.45	334.84	321.31	321.31
K₃	309.90	329.36	315.62	313.64	320.93
K₄	312.48	322.93	304.03	310.93	304.60
k₁	79.41	74.55	78.11	80.27	79.95
k₂	81.97	79.11	83.71	80.33	80.32
k₃	77.47	82.34	78.90	78.41	80.23
k₄	78.12	80.73	76.01	77.73	76.15
R	4.50	7.79	7.70	2.60	4.17
因素主次	B>C>A>E>D
较优方案	A₂B₃C₂D₂E₂

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 正交试验方差分析

Table 7. Analysis of variance of orthogonal experiments

源	III型平方和	df	均方	F值	Sig.
校正模型	1086.318^a	15	72.421	81.021	0.000
截距	301346.552	1	301346.552	337130.103	0.000
A	59.160	3	19.720	27.452	0.000
B	493.267	3	164.422	183.947	0.000
C	280.812	3	93.604	104.719	0.000
D	73.613	3	24.538	22.062	0.000
E	179.466	3	59.822	26.926	0.000
误差	28.603	32	0.894
总计	302461.473	48
校正的总计	1114.921	47
R²_Adj =0.962，R²=0.974

下载: 导出CSV

表 8 响应面各因素评价票数

Table 8. Number of evaluation votes for each factor of response surface

序号	滋味				气味				色泽				状态
序号	优	良	中	差	优	良	中	差	优	良	中	差	优	良	中	差
1	6	2	2	0	4	2	1	3	6	3	1	0	5	3	2	0
2	4	3	2	1	3	2	2	3	5	2	2	1	4	3	3	0
3	9	1	0	0	8	1	1	0	9	0	1	0	8	1	1	0
4	5	2	1	2	4	2	3	1	4	2	2	2	4	1	2	3
5	3	2	1	4	2	2	2	4	2	2	2	4	2	3	1	4
6	5	1	2	2	5	2	2	1	3	3	3	1	3	2	4	1
7	8	2	0	0	8	2	0	0	8	1	1	0	9	1	0	0
8	6	2	2	0	6	0	4	0	6	3	1	0	6	4	0	0
9	4	2	1	3	3	4	2	1	3	4	1	2	3	3	3	1
10	3	3	2	2	3	2	3	1	3	2	3	1	3	3	3	1
11	5	2	3	0	6	2	2	0	6	0	3	0	5	2	2	1
12	3	1	2	4	2	2	2	4	2	3	4	1	3	2	3	2
13	9	1	0	0	9	1	0	0	8	2	0	0	10	0	0	0
14	10	0	0	0	8	1	1	0	9	1	0	0	10	0	0	0
15	3	2	3	2	2	3	3	2	2	2	3	3	3	3	2	2
16	3	2	2	3	2	3	3	2	2	2	3	3	3	3	3	1
17	9	1	0	0	10	0	0	0	9	1	0	0	8	2	0	0

下载: 导出CSV

表 9 响应面试验结果分析

Table 9. Analysis of response surface test results

试验号	A	B	C	感官评分（分）
1	1	1	0	82.17
2	−1	0	1	79.09
3	0	0	0	87.89
4	0	−1	−1	78.56
5	1	0	1	72.90
6	−1	1	0	78.96
7	0	0	0	88.01
8	0	1	1	84.07
9	0	−1	1	77.91
10	−1	0	−1	74.05
11	−1	−1	0	80.99
12	1	0	−1	73.91
13	0	0	0	89.15
14	0	0	0	89.03
15	1	−1	0	75.37
16	0	1	−1	75.22
17	0	0	0	89.06

下载: 导出CSV

表 10 响应面回归模型的方差分析

Table 10. Analysis of variance of response surface regression model

方差来源	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P值	显著性
模型	549.73	9	61.08	69.90	<0.0001	**
A	9.55	1	9.55	10.93	0.0130	*
B	7.20	1	7.20	8.24	0.0240	*
C	18.70	1	18.70	21.40	0.0024	**
AB	19.49	1	19.49	22.31	0.0022	**
AC	9.15	1	9.15	10.47	0.0143	*
BC	22.56	1	22.56	25.82	0.0014	**
A²	183.63	1	183.63	210.14	<0.0001	**
B²	29.60	1	29.60	33.87	0.0006	**
C²	208.47	1	208.47	238.57	<0.0001	**
残差	6.12	7	0.87
失拟项	4.57	3	1.52	3.94	0.1093
纯误差	1.55	4	0.39
总离差	555.84	16
	R²=0.9890		R_Adj²=0.9748		C.V.%=1.15
注：表示对结果影响显著（P<0.05），*表示对结果影响极显著（P<0.01）。

下载: 导出CSV

表 11 理化和微生物检测结果

Table 11. Physicochemical and microbiological test results

序号	测定项目	测定结果	GB 31644-2018《食品安全国家标准复合调味料》要求	是否符合国家要求
1	水分含量	52.35 g/100 g	<65 g/100 g	符合
2	总酸含量	2.02 g/kg	<4 g/kg	符合
3	菌落总数	816.6 CFU/mL	10³ CFU/mL	符合
4	大肠菌群	无	无	符合
5	亚硝酸盐含量	2.53 mg/kg	<20 mg/kg	符合

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(29)

[1]	杨庆丽, 董艳, 刘玉, 等. 黑蒜加工中类黑精相关成分变化及其组成分析[J]. 中国调味品,2018,43(9):73−77. [YANG Q L, DONG Y, LIU Y, et al. Changes in the related components of melanoidin in black garlic processing and its composition analysis[J]. China Condiment,2018,43(9):73−77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2018.09.015
[2]	HALIMAH L S, HASAN K. Differences of bio (chemical) characterization of garlic and black garlic on antibacterial and antioxidant activities[J]. Journal of Physics:Conference Series,2021,17(1):1−6.
[3]	雷逢超, 郝果, 朱黎, 等. 黑蒜的营养价值及保健作用的研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技,2012,33(13):429−432. [LEI F C, HAO G, ZHU L, et al. Research progress in the nutritional value and health effects of black garlic[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2012,33(13):429−432. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2012.13.054
[4]	YUAN H, SUN L J, CHEN M, et al. The comparison of the contents of sugar, amadori, and heyns compounds in fresh and black garlic[J]. Journal of Food Science,2016,81(7):1662−1668. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13365
[5]	SUPATRA K, SURIYAN S, PENSIRI K, et al. Impact of steaming pretreatment process on characteristics and antioxidant activities of black garlic (Allium sativum L.)[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2020,58(5):1869−1876.
[6]	徐静娟, 王树英, 贡小清, 等. 茶树菇提取物的组分分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2006,27(12):165−167. [XU J J, WANG S Y, GONG X Q, et al. Composition analysis of agrocybe cylindracea extract[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2006,27(12):165−167. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0306.2006.12.053
[7]	TSAI S, HUANG S, MAU J. Antioxidant properties of hot water extracts from agrocybe cylindracea[J]. Food Chemistry,2006,98(4):670−677. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.07.003
[8]	廖丹葵. 茶树菇多糖的提取研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2007,28(1):16−17. [LIAO D K. Study on extraction of polysaccharides from agrocybe Chashugu[J]. Food Research and Development,2007,28(1):16−17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2007.01.006
[9]	高珊. 茶树菇味复合发酵调味品的研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2008. GAO S. Study on compound fermentation condiment of tea tree mushroom flavor[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2008.
[10]	刘静, 李湘利, 赵强, 等. 黑蒜鸡枞菌复合饮料的制备及其清除自由基[J]. 食品科技,2019,44(3):102−107. [LIU J, LI X, ZHAO Q, et al. Preparation and scavenging free radical activity of compound beverage with black garlic and Termitomyces albuminosus[J]. Food Science Technology,2019,44(3):102−107.
[11]	贾庆超, 梁艳美, 张宇恒. 响应面法优化黑蒜鸡枞菌酱制备工艺[J]. 中国调味品,2021,46(11):94−100. [JIA Q C, LIANG Y M, ZHANG Y H. Optimization of preparation technology of black garlic chicken fir mushroom sauce by response surface methodology[J]. China Condiment,2021,46(11):94−100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2021.11.018
[12]	贾庆超, 梁艳美, 卢灿, 等. 响应面法优化黑蒜银条酱制备工艺[J]. 中国调味品,2021,46(12):92−97. [JIA Q C, LIANG Y M, LU C, et al. Optimization of preparation technology of black garlic silver bar sauce by response surface methodology[J]. China Condiment,2021,46(12):92−97.
[13]	王林. 香辣鸡枞牛肉酱的研制[J]. 中国调味品,2019,44(1):129−131. [WANG L. Development of spicy Collybia albuminosa beef paste[J]. China Condiment,2019,44(1):129−131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2019.01.030
[14]	袁益欢, 陈祖明, 周占富, 等. 江湖风味泡椒香辣酱制作工艺研究[J]. 中国调味品,2019,44(4):152−155, 158. [YUAN Y H, CHEN Z M, ZHOU Z F, et al. Study on the processing technology of pickled pepper spicy saucewith Jianghu flavor[J]. China Condiment,2019,44(4):152−155, 158. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2019.04.034
[15]	贾庆超, 梁艳美, 张杰. 五香牛肉鸡枞菌风味酱的研制[J]. 中国酿造,2021,40(3):195−200. [JIA Q C, LIANG Y M, ZHANG J. Development of spicy beef and Collybia albuminosa flavor sauce[J]. China Brewing,2021,40(3):195−200. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2021.03.037
[16]	李梦倩, 章海风, 凌晓冬, 等. 模糊数学感官评价结合响应面法优化低脂蛋黄酱工艺配方[J]. 中国调味品,2021,46(8):82−87. [LI M Q, ZHANG H F, LING X D, et al. Optimization of low-fat mayonnaise technological formula by fuzzy mathematical sensory evaluation combined with response surface methodology[J]. China Condiment,2021,46(8):82−87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2021.08.018
[17]	李子晗, 杨名春, 李庆鹏, 等. 模糊数学感官评价结合响应面法优化刺玫果苹果低糖复合果酱配方[J]. 中国调味品,2021,46(6):107−113. [LI Z H, YANG M C, LI Q P, et al. Optimization of low-sugar compound jam formula of Rosa davurica Pall. andapple by fuzzy mathematical sensory evaluation and response surface method[J]. China Condiment,2021,46(6):107−113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2021.06.020
[18]	赵晓娟, 吴均, 陈佳昕, 等. 苦荞纳豆酱的抗氧化活性[J]. 食品科学,2014,35(13):122−126. [ZHAO X J, WU J, CHEN J X, et al. Antioxidant activity of tartary buckwheat natto[J]. Food Science,2014,35(13):122−126. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201413023
[19]	李吉达, 彭婷, 赵玥, 等. 黔野生猕猴桃果酱的制备及体外抗氧化性研究[J]. 食品研究与开发,2019,40(3):119−124. [LI J D, PENG T, ZHAO Y, et al. Preparation and antioxidant function in vitro of wild kiwi jam in Guizhou Province[J]. Food Research and Development,2019,40(3):119−124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2019.03.021
[20]	王喜波, 于洁, 张泽宇, 等. 黑蒜非发酵法制备工艺与抗氧化活性研究[J]. 农业机械学报,2017,48(4):321−326. [WANG X B, YU J, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Non-fermentation process preparation of black garlic and its antioxidant activity[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery,2017,48(4):321−326. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.04.042
[21]	马承慧, 王群, 刘牧. 3种松科植物松针多酚的体外抗氧化活性评价[J]. 西南农业学报,2016,29(5):1063−1067. [MA C H, WANG Q, LIU M. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of pine polyphenols from three pinaceae species in vitro[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Gciences,2016,29(5):1063−1067.
[22]	雷文平, 吴诗敏, 李彩虹, 等. 响应面法优化凝固型发酵椰奶工艺[J]. 中国酿造,2019,38(2):212−216. [LEI W P, WU S M, LI C H, et al. Process optimization of set-style fermented coconut milk by response surface methodology[J]. China Brewing,2019,38(2):212−216. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2019.02.041
[23]	廖明星, 吴华鑫, 缪园欣. 响应面法优化红心火龙果皮发酵饮料发酵工艺[J]. 中国酿造,2020,39(4):142−146. [LIAO M X, WU H X, MIU Y X. Optimization of fermentation technology of fermented red dragon fruit peel beverage by response surface method[J]. China Brewing,2020,39(4):142−146. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2020.04.028
[24]	万茵, 王登骁, 梁玉禧, 等. 响应曲面法优化米曲霉NCUF414低盐发酵芝麻粕酱工艺[J]. 南昌大学学报(自然科学版),2018,43(5):465−471. [WAN Y, WANG X R, LIANG Y X, et al. Optimizing low-salt sauce of fermented sesame dregs with Aspergillus oryzae NCUF414 by response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Nanchang University (Natural Science),2018,43(5):465−471.
[25]	汪洪涛, 李清光, 薛珂. 罗汉果花提取液对鲜切苹果保鲜效果的影响[J]. 食品工业,2019,40(12):89−93. [WANG H T, LI Q G, XUE K. Effect of Momordica grosvenorii flower extract on fresh-keeping of fresh-cut apples[J]. The Food Industry,2019,40(12):89−93.
[26]	郑清, 陈宝印, 杨磊, 等. 响应面法优化同步提取黑蒜中多酚与黄酮的工艺及抗氧化活性的测定[J]. 中国调味品,2021,46(5):69−76. [ZHENG Q, CHEN B Y, YANG L, et al. Optimization of simultaneous extraction of polyphenols and flavonoids from black garlic by response surface methodology and determination of antioxidant activity[J]. China Condiment,2021,46(5):69−76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9973.2021.05.014
[27]	郑绪恒. 茶树菇提取物对高强度剧烈运动的抗疲劳作用[J]. 中国食用菌,2020,39(4):37−39. [ZHENG X H. The Effect of Agrocybe aegerita extract on anti fatigue in high intensity and strenuous exercise[J]. Edible Fungi of China,2020,39(4):37−39. doi: 10.13629/j.cnki.53-1054.2020.04.009
[28]	钟成, 徐国娟, 吴晓英, 等. 保压时间对黑蒜部分营养成分和抗氧化作用的影响[J]. 现代食品科技,2014,30(3):49−52, 136. [ZHONG C, XU G J, WU X Y, et al. Effects of pressure holding time on some nutrients and antioxidation of black garlic[J]. Modern Food Technology,2014,30(3):49−52, 136.
[29]	KIM J H, NAM S H, RICO C W, et al. A comparative study on the antioxidative and anti-allergic activities of fresh and aged black garlic extracts[J]. International Journal of Food Science and Technology,2012,47(6):1176−1182. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.02957.x