海绵<i>Hyrtios erectus</i>抗氧化产物超声提取工艺优化及其抗氧化活性分析

刘书伟; 沈梦霞; 王燕; 张田田; 武天明

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070373

海绵Hyrtios erectus抗氧化产物超声提取工艺优化及其抗氧化活性分析

doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022070373

海南热带海洋学院生态环境学院，海南三亚 572022

基金项目: 三亚市农业科技创新项目（2019NK12）；海南省自然科学基金项目资助（221MS049，321RC589，423MS052）；海南省科技项目资助（ZDYF2022XDNY172）。

详细信息

作者简介:
刘书伟（1978−），男，博士，副教授，研究方向：食品和药品资源开发，E-mail：hnlsw@163.com

通讯作者:
张田田（1986−），女，博士，讲师，研究方向：食品和药品资源开发，E-mail：zhangtiantian2011@163.com

中图分类号: TS202.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 18
- HTML全文浏览量: 21
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-02
- 刊出日期: 2023-05-01

Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction Optimization of Antioxidant Products from Hyrtios erectus and Its Antioxidant Activity

College of Ecology and Environment, Hainan Tropical Ocean University, Sanya 572022, China

摘要

摘要: 为探索海绵动物抗氧化提取物的提取工艺及提取物的抗氧化活性，以H. erectus海绵乙醇提取物的DPPH自由基清除率为响应值，分别考察超声温度、超声时间和超声功率3个影响因素，通过Box-Behnken响应面设计确定最佳超声提取工艺。以该工艺提取物为实验材料，分析其对DPPH自由基、ABTS⁺•和•OH的清除效果，通过构建H₂O₂氧化损伤模型研究提取物对氧化损伤L02细胞的活力和对H₂O₂氧化应激胞内ROS含量的影响。结果表明：可操作的最佳工艺为超声温度57 ℃，超声时间60 min，超声功率490 W，在此条件下，提取物DPPH自由基清除率为61.98%±1.52%，与预测值62.16%吻合度较好，该提取物对DPPH自由基、ABTS⁺•和•OH具有良好的清除效果，提取物处理组细胞活力均显著高于模型组（P<0.05），且细胞内ROS荧光强度均极显著低于模型组（P<0.01）。总之，该工艺提取物具有较广泛的抗氧化活性，对H₂O₂氧化损伤的L02细胞具有保护作用，该研究可为抗氧化食品添加剂的研发提供理论支撑。
- 响应面 /
- 海绵动物 /
- 抗氧化 /
- 自由基 /
- 活性氧
Abstract: To explore the process of extraction and antioxidant activity of products from marine sponge, three influencing factors, ultrasonic temperature, ultrasonic time, and ultrasonic power were investigated respectively taking DPPH radicals scavenging rate of ethanol extracts from H. erectus as the response value, and the optimal ultrasonic-assisted extraction process was determined by Box-Behnken design. The extract obtained from H. erectus by the best ultrasonic-assisted process was detected for antioxidant activity, which included the scavenging effect on DPPH radicals, ABTS⁺• and •OH. The effects of the extract on viability of oxidative damage L02 cells and content of intracellular ROS were detected by constructing a cell model of H₂O₂ induced oxidative damage. The results showed that the optimized process conditions were as follows: Ultrasonic temperature was 57 ℃, ultrasonic time was 60 min, and ultrasonic power was 490 W. Under these conditions, the DPPH scavenging rate of the extract was 61.98%±1.52%, which agreed well with the predicted value of 62.16%. The extract showed good scavenging effects on DPPH radical, ABTS⁺• and •OH. The cell viability of treated groups was significantly higher than that of the model group (P<0.05), and the intensity of intracellular ROS fluorescence was significantly lower than that of the model group (P<0.01). In general, the product from H. erectus had a wide range of antioxidant activity, and it had a protective effect on H₂O₂ induced oxidative damage in L02 cells. This study provides theoretical support for the research and development of antioxidant food additives.
- response surface /
- marine sponge /
- anti-oxidation /
- free radical /
- reactive oxygen species (ROS)

HTML全文

图 1 超声温度对DPPH自由基清除率和粗提物得率的影响

注：图中不同小写字母表示差异显著P<0.05，图2~图3同。

Figure 1. Effect of ultrasonic temperature on the scavenging rate of DPPH free radical and yield of crude extract

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 超声时间对DPPH自由基清除率和粗提物得率的影响

Figure 2. Effect of ultrasonic time on the scavenging rate of DPPH free radical and yield of crude extract

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 超声功率对DPPH自由基清除率和粗提物得率的影响

Figure 3. Effect of ultrasonic power on the scavenging rate of DPPH free radical and yield of crude extract

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 各因素交互作用对DPPH自由基清除率的响应面和等高线图

Figure 4. Response surface and contour figures of the interaction effects of various factors on the scavenging rate of DPPH free radicals

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 提取物对3种自由基的清除效果

Figure 5. The scavenging effect of the extract on three free radicals

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 提取物对H₂O₂氧化损伤L02细胞活力的影响

注：*表示差异显著（P<0.05），**表示差异极显著（P<0.01）；+表示添加，−表示未添加；图7同。

Figure 6. Effects of extracts on the viability of L02 cells damaged by H₂O₂ oxidation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 提取物对H₂O₂氧化应激L02细胞内ROS的影响

Figure 7. Effect of extracts on reactive oxygen species in L02 cells with H₂O₂-induced oxidative damage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 Box-Behnken设计的因素与水平

Table 1. Factors and levels of Box-Behnken design

因素	编码	水平
因素	编码	−1	0	1
超声温度（℃）	A	40	50	60
超声时间（min）	B	50	60	70
超声功率（W）	C	400	500	600

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 Box-Behnken试验设计结果

Table 2. Results of Box-Behnken experiments design

试验号	A超声温度	B超声时间	C超声功率	Y DPPH自由基清除率（%）
1	0	1	−1	48.08±2.25
2	0	1	1	41.69±2.59
3	−1	−1	0	38.82±2.41
4	1	−1	0	46.31±1.70
5	0	0	0	62.03±1.11
6	1	1	0	41.65±1.25
7	−1	1	0	42.76±2.21
8	0	0	0	61.80±1.26
9	1	0	−1	45.36±1.59
10	0	−1	1	44.22±2.50
11	−1	0	−1	46.01±3.34
12	1	0	1	44.31±1.01
13	0	0	0	61.79±1.70
14	0	0	0	61.98±2.82
15	−1	0	1	37.47±1.33
16	0	−1	−1	47.49±2.13
17	0	0	0	62.09±3.15

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 回归模型方程的方差分析

Table 3. Variance analysis of regression model equation

方差来源	平方和	自由度	均方	F值	P	显著性
回归模型	1297.09	9	144.12	3800.45	<0.0001	**
A-超声温度	19.75	1	19.75	520.82	0.0001	**
B-超声时间	0.88	1	0.88	23.32	0.019	*
C-超声功率	46.32	1	46.32	1221.46	<0.0001	**
AB	18.49	1	18.49	487.58	<0.0001	**
AC	14.03	1	14.03	369.84	<0.0001	**
BC	2.43	1	2.43	64.17	<0.0001	**
A²	492.73	1	492.73	12993.24	<0.0001	**
B²	321.28	1	321.28	8472.16	<0.0001	**
C²	258.32	1	258.32	6811.96	<0.0001	**
残差	0.27	7	0.038	−	−	−
失拟项	0.19	3	0.064	3.43	0.1323	N
净误差	0.074	4	0.019	−	−	−
总离差	1297.36	16	−	−	−	−
R²=0.9998，R²_adj=0.9995
注：代表P<0.05，*代表P<0.01，N代表差异无统计学意义，“−”表示无此项。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(42)

[1]	UKOWIAK M. Utilizing sponge spicules in taxonomic, ecological and environmental reconstructions: A review[J]. Peer J,2020,8(2):e10601.
[2]	PAUL V J, FREEMAN C J, AGARWAL V. Chemical ecology of marine sponges: New opportunities through “-Omics”[J]. Integrative and Comparative Biology,2019,59(4):765−776. doi: 10.1093/icb/icz014
[3]	ANTENEH Y S, YANG Q, BROWN M H, et al. Antimicrobial activities of marine sponge-associated bacteria[J]. Microorganisms,2021,9(1):171. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010171
[4]	El-DEMERDASH A, ATANASOV A G, HORBANCZUK O K, et al. Chemical diversity and biological activities of marine sponges of the genus Suberea: A systematic review[J]. Mar Drugs,2019,17(2):115. doi: 10.3390/md17020115
[5]	DATTA D, TALAPATRA S N, SWARNAKAR S. Bioactive compounds from marine invertebrates for potential medicines-An overview[J]. Int Lett Nat Sci,2015,34:42−61.
[6]	MARIEKE K DIRK M, RENE W. Towards commercial production of sponge medicines[J]. Mar Drugs,2009,7(4):787−802. doi: 10.3390/md7040787
[7]	SIMMONS T L, ANDRIANASOLO E, MCPHAIL K, et al. Marine natural products as anticancer drugs[J]. Mol Cancer Ther,2005,4(2):333. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.333.4.2
[8]	NEWMAN D J, CRAGG G M. Marine natural products and related compounds in clinical and advanced preclinical trials[J]. J Nat Prod,2004,67(8):1216−1238. doi: 10.1021/np040031y
[9]	CARROLL A R, COPP B R, DAVI S, et al. Marine natural products[J]. Nat Prod Rep,2019,36:122−173. doi: 10.1039/C8NP00092A
[10]	ZHU J Y, LIU Y, LIU Z J, et al. Bioactive nitrogenous secondary metabolites from the marine sponge genus Haliclona[J]. Mar Drugs,2019,17(12):682. doi: 10.3390/md17120682
[11]	NADAR V M, MANIVANNAN S, CHINNAIYAN R, et al. Review on marine sponge alkaloid, aaptamine: A potential anti-bacterial and anti-cancer drug[J]. Chem Biol Drug Des,2022,99:103−110. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13932
[12]	ZHANG B, ZHANG T, XU J Z, et al. Marine sponge-associated fungi as potential novel bioactive natural product sources for drug discovery: A review[J]. Mini Rev Med Cheistry,2020,20:1966−2010. doi: 10.2174/1389557520666200826123248
[13]	CHENG M M, TANG X L, SUN Y T, et al. Biological and chemical diversity of marine sponge-derived microorganisms over the last two decades from 1998 to 2017[J]. Molecules,2020,25(4):853. doi: 10.3390/molecules25040853
[14]	SYAMSUDIN A, AWIK P D N, SRI N, et al. Cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of marine sponge diversity at pecaron bay pasir putih situbondo East Java, Indonesia[J]. J Phar Res,2013,6(7):685−689.
[15]	ZHANG H W, ZHAO Z P, WANG H. Cytotoxic natural products from marine sponge-derived microorganisms[J]. Mar Drugs,2017,15(3):68. doi: 10.3390/md15030068
[16]	CAMPOS P E, PICKON E, MORIOU C, et al. New antimalarial and antimicrobial tryptamine derivatives from the marine sponge Fascaplysinopsis reticulata[J]. Mar Drugs,2019,17(3):167. doi: 10.3390/md17030167
[17]	KIM Y A, JI Y K, KIM N H, et al. Isoquinolinequinone derivatives from a marine sponge (Haliclona sp.) regulate inflammation in vitro system of intestine[J]. Mar Drugs,2021,19(2):90. doi: 10.3390/md19020090
[18]	TINTILLIER F, MORIOU C, PETEK S, et al. Quorum sensing inhibitory and antifouling activities of new bromotyrosine metabolites from the polynesian sponge Pseudoceratinan sp.[J]. Mar Drugs,2020,18(5):272. doi: 10.3390/md18050272
[19]	MUTHIYAN R, MAHANTA N, NAMBIKKAIRAJ B, et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of a methanol extract from the marine sponge Hyrtios erectus[J]. Phcog Mag,2018,14:534−540. doi: 10.4103/pm.pm_133_17
[20]	HU T Y, ZHANG H, CHEN Y Y, et al. Dysiarenone from marine sponge Dysidea arenaria attenuates ROS and inflammation via inhibition of 5-LOX/NF-κB/MAPKs and upregulation of Nrf-2/OH-1 in RAW 264.7 macrophages[J]. J Inf Res,2021,14:587−597. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S283745
[21]	GINER R M, RÍOS J L, MÁÑEZ S. Antioxidant activity of natural hydroquinones[J]. Antioxidants,2022,11(2):343. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020343
[22]	SUNARWIDHI A L, ROSYANTARI A, PRASEDYA E S, et al. The correlation between total protein content and antioxidant activity of collagen isolated from a marine sponge Stylissa flabelliformis collected from North Lombok Indonesia coast[C]//IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2021, 913(1): 012103.
[23]	OOGARAH P N, RAMANJOOLOO A, ROVISHAM J, et al. Assessing antioxidant activity and phenolic content of marine sponges from mauritius waters[J]. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research,2020,12:123−131.
[24]	AFSHARI K, SAMAVATI V, SHAHIDI S A. Ultrasonic-assisted extraction and in-vitro antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from Hibiscus leaf[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2015,74:558−567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.07.023
[25]	张红军. 三种西沙海绵化学成分和生物活性研究[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2009 ZHANG H J. Chemical constituents and bioactivities of three marine sponges from Paracel Islands[D]. Shanghai: The Second Military Medical University, 2009.
[26]	YOUSSEF D T A. Hyrtioerectines A-C, Cytotoxic Alkaloids from the red sea sponge Hyrtios erectus[J]. Journal of Natural Products,2005,68(9):1416−1419. doi: 10.1021/np050142c
[27]	SWANTARA I M D, RITA W S, HERNINDY R A. Isolation and phytochemical test of anticancer isolate of sponge Hyrtios erecta[J]. Jhsm Unud J,2017,1:16−20. doi: 10.24843/JHSM.2017.v01.i01.p05
[28]	AL-MASSARANI S M, EL-GAMAL A A, AL-SAID M S, et al. Studies on the red sea sponge Haliclona sp. for its chemical and cytotoxic properties[J]. Pharmacognosy Magazine,2016,12(46):114. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.177906
[29]	陈江艳, 王维滔, 董益阳, 等. 响应面优化蒲公英橡胶草菊糖提取工艺及其MALDI-TOF MS分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2022,43(1):205−212. [CHEN J Y, WANG W T, DONG Y Y, et al. Optimization of extraction of inulin from Taraxacum kok-saghyz Rodin by response surface methodology and its MALDI-TOF MS analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2022,43(1):205−212.
[30]	钱燕芳, 石晨莹, 陈贵堂. 桑葚多糖超声提取、脱色工艺优化及其抗氧化活性分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2022,43(16):201−210. [QIAN Yanfang, SHI Chenying, CHEN Guitang. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction and decolorization process of polysaccharides from Mori fructus and its antioxidant activity[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2022,43(16):201−210. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021110007
[31]	叶兆伟, 叶润, 赫丁轩, 等. 息半夏多糖提取工艺优化及其抗氧化活性研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂,2022,33(1):90−98. [YE Z W, YE R, HAO D X, et al. Optimization of polysaccharide extraction from Xi Pinellia ternate by response surface methodology and its antioxidant activity[J]. China Food Additives,2022,33(1):90−98. doi: 10.19804/j.issn1006-2513.2022.01.014
[32]	常国立, 房祥军, 陈明, 等. 杨梅核多酚提取优化及体外抗氧化和降血糖活性研究[J]. 食品科技,2022,47(1):212−218. [CHANG G L, FANG X J, CHEN M, et al. Extraction optimization and in vitro antioxidant and hypoglycemic activity of polyphenols from Myrica rubra kernel[J]. Food Science and Technology,2022,47(1):212−218. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9989.2022.1.spkj202201032
[33]	AATI H N, EL-GAMAL A, KAYSER O. Chemical composition and biological activity of the essential oil from the root of Jatropha pelargoniifolia Courb. native to Saudi Arabia[J]. Saudi Pharm J,2019,27(1):88−95. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.09.001
[34]	杜毅超, 张浩, 黄治伟, 等. 芹菜素对H₂O₂诱导人肝细胞L02氧化损伤模型的影响[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志,2020,36(5):1077−1081. [DU Y C, ZHANG H, HUANG Z W, et al. Effect of apigenin on H₂O₂-induced oxidative injury in human hepatocytes L02[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2020,36(5):1077−1081. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.05.025
[35]	LI C, YANG F, HUANG Y, et al. Comparison of hydrodynamic and ultrasonic cavitation effects on soy protein isolate functionality[J]. Journal of Food Engineering,2020,265:109697. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109697
[36]	YE L, ZHU X, WEI X. Damage characteristics and surface description of near-wall materials subjected to ultrasonic cavitation[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,2020,67:105175. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105175
[37]	罗维巍, 李双, 刁全平, 等. 响应面法优化超声提取酸浆宿萼中叶黄素的工艺及抗氧化活性研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂,2022,33(1):62−68. [LUO W W, LI S, DIAO Q P, et al. Optimization of ultrasonic extraction process for lutein from calyx of Physalis by response surface methodology and its antioxidant capacity study[J]. China Food Additives,2022,33(1):62−68.
[38]	杨秋明, 宋江峰, 李大婧, 等. 响应面法优化超声波提取南瓜皮叶黄素的工艺研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2018,39(1):149−155. [YANG Q M, SONG J F, LI D J, et al. Optimization of ultrasonic extraction process for lutein from pumpkin peel by response surface methodology[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2018,39(1):149−155. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.01.028
[39]	GUO H, CHENG J, MAO Y, et al. Synergistic effect of ultrasound and switchable hydrophilicity solvent promotes microalgal cell disruption and lipid extraction for biodiesel production[J]. Bioresource Technology,2022,343:126087. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126087
[40]	UTKINA N K. Antioxidant activity of zyzzyanones and makaluvamines from the marine sponge Zyzzya fuliginosa[J]. Natural Product Communications,2013,8(11):1551−1552.
[41]	崔素萍, 陈丹, 穆秋霞, 等. 细胞氧化应激的危害及抗氧化应激的研究进展[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2022,34(4):74−79, 133. [CUI S P, CHEN D, MU Q X, et al. Harm of cellular oxidative stress and research progress of anti-oxidative stress[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University,2022,34(4):74−79, 133. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2090.2022.04.011
[42]	蔡瑾, 闫然, 王梦亮, 等. 二氢槲皮素对大肠杆菌的抑菌作用机理[J/OL]. 食品科学: 1−14 [2022-09-26] DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20220512-148. CAI J, YAN R, WANG M L, et al. The mechanism of antimicrobial action of dihydroquercetin against Escherichia coli[J]. Food Science, 1−14 [2022-09-26] DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20220512-148.